With the dawn of computers and artificial intelligence, many mundane occupations have become outmoded. The professionals who will retain their jobs are those with strong imaginative skills, who can apply their previous experience and background knowledge to novel situations. However, this background knowledge is incredibly important; imagination is only a tool to apply previous experience to novel situations, but having a strong foundation in background knowledge is far more important to success in many fields.
Before most professionals can begin practicing in their intended field, they must devote years to gaining background knowledge. Medical doctors must have some degree of imagination to deal with new cases, but to even begin to understand what is happening in the body requires years of intense study and a staggering amount of background information. This knowledge is not innate, and requires a great deal of effort to learn, while imagination can often come naturally.
Furthermore, professionals who have a strong background of prior experience in the field can often get away without being especially imaginative. Take, for example, a civil engineer working at a consulting firm. While there is some degree of creativity involved in solving new problems, what often makes professionals stand out is their wealth of prior experience and ability to recognize patterns from old problems, which primarily comes with knowledge and experience.
While knowledge trumps imagination in many technical fields, disciplines such as the arts and literature are far more dependent on imagination. There are many examples of pianists and artists who succeed and drive innovation in their fields while being entirely self taught and lacking formal training. It is often quite helpful to have an understanding of previous work in the field for success, but the arts provide a rare case where previous knowledge can sometimes hamper creativity and limit expression if individuals are influenced heavily by old works. Therefore, imagination is crucial to success.
Imagination and knowledge work hand-in-hand in most fields, as people use prior knowledge and experience as a launching point to develop new ideas, works, and solutions. Truly successful professionals possess both knowledge and imagination, but the degree to which each is valued true varies by profession.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61495844875 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08724487955 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540166204986 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3506214885 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.133333333 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125547824203 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479584070825 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552883907107 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718959070349 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364558267821 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.