In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Unquestionably, both a rich imagination and the establishment of profound knowledge plays a critical role in the advancement of most professions and academic fields. Some people say that imaginative power is more important than accumulation of knowledge, while others do not, and both sides may have their own reasons to support their views. In my opinion, extensive learning is more significant than imagination to achieve the academic development. There are several reasons why I disagree with the given statement as follows.
Admittedly, in the history of professions and academic fields, most eminent achievements could not be existed without the accomplishers’ brilliant ingenuity. To push back the frontier of academic fields, people should find a breakthrough to settle the unsolved problems in each field, and contrive innovative and unconventional methodologies. Most praiseworthy exploits begin from seemingly simple, but sparkling ideas, and such a novelty could not be attained without a flexible imaginative power. For example, artificial neural networks have been recently spotlighted in the field of artificial intelligence and pattern recognition. This notion was invented by psychologist Frank Rosenblatt in 1958, and it is inspired by the structure of neurons in human brains. Artificial neural networks have started to draw attention by their outstanding performances in the field of supervised learning, such as image classification and sequence recognition. This idea seems simple and intuitive, but it would not been able to developed as a state-of-the-art technique in the field of artificial intelligence without Rosenblatt’s ingenuity. For these reasons, imagination plays an important role in a majority of professions and academic fields.
However, those creative ideas cannot contribute to the advancement of professions and academic fields with the absence of basic knowledges. In the case of academic fields, researchers publicize their works in the form of articles, journal papers, or presentations in conferences. For the publication of their new studies, they should refine their notions into pithy and clear language for precise expression of opinions and readability, and this procedure normally requires a profound understanding of background knowledges in related fields. To be specific, let me adduce an example of researches in mathematical sciences. There are celebrated seven open problems in mathematics, known as Millennium problems. Even reading articles discussing such unsolved problems is regarded as an impossible task without any relevant preliminary knowledges. Moreover, it is preposterous to challenge those problems with no insight and understanding of relevant works. Hence, the accumulation of sufficient knowledges should be preceded the spread of imaginations to fathom the recent developments of the target problem and to express one’s opinion succinctly and precisely.
In brief, even though creativity and brilliant ideas are significant in the advancement of professions and academic fields, profound establishment of pertinent knowledges plays a more important role in their developments for the reasons I have mentioned above. All in all, the importance of building necessary knowledges cannot be underestimated in the pursuit of success in most professions and academic fields.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in brief, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2868.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86503067485 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39037349338 2.79657885939 121% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 888.3 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1989551727 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.363636364 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2272727273 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221915582824 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655889391856 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491901594022 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151437712069 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430597055964 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.1639044944 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.