In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and

Essay topics:

In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position

While Imagination as a crucial key of human evolution history, is definitely important for it helps explore the unknowns and establish new rules, I strongly disagree regard imagination as the most important element rather than knowledge in professions and academic fields.

With the demand of specialization, the needed depth of knowledge in certain area has been significant. Imagination itself can no longer make big contribution to professions without mastering professional knowledge. Wright brothers, for instance, was credited with creating and flying the first motor-operated aircraft, but when it comes to modern technology product, such as Boeing 747, it is impossible for a people or a group to complete the complicated design of it. In high-technology time, imagination cannot replace the role of knowledge and for most common situation, only with enough knowledge can specialized individuals have the opportunities to make their imaginations come true.

Meanwhile, deny to admit the importance of knowledge can lead to anti-intellectualism. New technology is actually changing our daily life and the refusal to knowledge is equal with rejecting the progress in intelligence. Genetic modification is a set of technologies to change genetic makeup of cells, providing stable and new function to organisms, has been proven to be safe by numerous experiments but still be rejected by some groups in society. This technology can break the boundaries of different species and create more advantages, while there are always some skeptical comments on knowledge of genetic engineering. It is true that such against will hinder the development of genetic exploration and utilization.

Some people may argue that imagination has expanded the boundaries of knowledge, for many of the most famous innovation is from imagination. The special theory of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein is a good evidence because this theory explained the relationship between space and time and lard a solid foundation of modern Physics. Although such imagination does make great contribution to us, it is rare. Not anyone who likes to imagine is like Newton or Einstein, actually their innovation are also based on the basic knowledge of Physics and Math.

In a sum, I have to admit that imagination is useful and can push the development of technology, but knowledge always plays a more crucial role in our history and will keep being seen as a necessary role for meeting the demand of further progress in both professions and academic fields.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'deny admitting'.
Suggestion: deny admitting
...r imaginations come true. Meanwhile, deny to admit the importance of knowledge can lead to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23113436943 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558080808081 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.636692487 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186359220971 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606776133637 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466727875801 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112519603678 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471712359155 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'deny admitting'.
Suggestion: deny admitting
...r imaginations come true. Meanwhile, deny to admit the importance of knowledge can lead to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23113436943 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558080808081 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.636692487 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186359220971 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606776133637 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466727875801 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112519603678 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471712359155 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.