A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
No two students are alike, then why should their curriculum be? The given prompts suggests that all the students should study a same national curriculum until they enter college. In my opinion this is should not be promoted because of the following three reasons.
To begin with, research has shown that diverse environment leads to a more innovative spirit. If the imaginative minds of students are confined inside a fixed and rigid curriculum, it would leave a little to no scope for "outside the box" thinking. If every student is exposed to the same problems, then there would be no one thinking about the new problems or coming up with solutions to solve different problems that they might face in the future. Lets say, a student faces problem in solving a math problem, then everyone would be helping to solve only math problem even if they decide not to pursue mathematics in college. So the resources that will be available for different subjects would be scarce as compared to mathematics, which not everyone will be pursuing.
Further, a majority of a students are determined enough to know which career path they will be following, and hence have a very specific learning journey in mind. For example, a student might be sure that she would be pursuing data science and would therefore require a program that focuses on statistics, mathematics and programing. However, at the same time another student might be interested in pursuing a career in politics and therefore, would require a program that focuses on social sciences. And since both of these programs lie at the opposite ends of a spectrum, it would be difficult to encorporate them in a single curriculum, and even if they did, it would be cumbersome for every student to be able to follow such a rigorous subjects at onces.
On the other hand, some might say that judging the capabilities of students on a fixed scales will promote equality and will ultimately reduce the number of resources that will have to be allocated to educational institutes. However, to paraphrase Einstein, " if you judge a fish by its ability to climb tree, it would lead uts entire life thinking that it is stupid", as this would not do justice to those students whose interested learning path are not included in the curriculum. For instance, a student might be interested in pursuing humanities as a career, but because of comparitively low demand for arts or humanities, the educational institute might be reluctant to add humanities in the curriculum and thus the student would then have to take up on a curriculum that does not quench his thirst and would not be able to perform wholeheartedly. Therefore, students should be free to curate their own curriculum based on their interests and passions and a nation should not dictate their curriculum until college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... they enter college. In my opinion this is should not be promoted because of the f...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ems that they might face in the future. Lets say, a student faces problem in solving...
^^^^
Line 6, column 24, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...e pursuing. Further, a majority of a students are determined enough to know which car...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 155, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...e have a very specific learning journey in mind. For example, a student might be s...
^^
Line 6, column 741, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'subject'?
Suggestion: subject
...nt to be able to follow such a rigorous subjects at onces. On the other hand, some ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'scale'?
Suggestion: scale
...the capabilities of students on a fixed scales will promote equality and will ultimate...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97693920335 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82155216146 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4070046686 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.375 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8125 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162518313809 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689377512892 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694644464163 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125071344206 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610180651801 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.