A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Every student's life is shaped by their school. It sets the foundation of their morals, principles and of course, their academics. Any bias must be avoided in the case of academics, which would only be possible if all students of a country be required to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
If a nation has a number of varying curriculums, some curriculums may not teach each subject in the same depth as the others. This could cause a bias in acceptance of students into college. A student who has studied in a school which offers a curriculum teaching subjects in more depth than another has an undue advantage over another equally capable student enrolled in another, less involved curriculum. The former student would be able to perform better on competitive entrance exams than the latter, even though both of them are equally intelligent and hard-working.
Another problem with varying curriculums would be the difference in diversity of the subjects in the curriculum. A curriculum offering a variety of courses would allow its students to have knowledge of more subjects and hence, more knowledge of the choices they have while entering college. Some of these choices would not even be considered by a student from a not so diverse curriculum. The result of this would be a fewer number of students enrolling for courses which are not well known or not covered in some syllabi. Aside from this, a student who may be brilliant in a specific field would not even consider it since he/she would not even know about it.
However, there could also be unforeseen problems with having a single national curriculum. Having students study the same syllabus would cause those less capable to fall behind. These students would not have the choice to pick an easier curriculum over a rigorous one. This could cause such students to lose interest in their academic activities.
Studying the same national curriculum could have a number of beneficial effects for the students of a country, along with avoiding undue bias during their admission into college. Such an initiative should be taken for the benefit of students throughout the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 59
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 75
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
Every students life is shaped by their school. It sets...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04166666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65047020054 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5026549089 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322887525515 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106093511544 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811963264715 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204280349611 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566246962463 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.