A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Let me start with this famous proverb that read as "NO MAN is AN ISLAND", for a sound development of any nation there must be a contrubution of different experts from different disciplines, ranging from art, sciences and humanities. However, studying same national curriculum implies that the student will have same background that may likely produce similar professionals and not the different expertise that are necessary fro a national development.
Education is the fundamental aspect of any national developments. it is no doubt that for a ntion to develop, the need for expets in various discipline can not be overemphasised. it is on this note that I quite disagree with the recommendation that the a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum untill they enter college.
it is a well known fact that interest and passion is moslty buid at early age, thus by limiting the students to the same national curriculum the system is directly limiting their interest to specific areas. this is not in any way advantageous to any nation serious of development. The students should be allowed to study different national currculum prior to their college studies, this will allow them to discover themseleves early, which will in turn lead them to become grat asset for a national development of different specialization of their interests.
Conclusively, the students should be allowed to study different curriculum that may align with their interest at early age, which will hwlp them contribute significanlty to successful professinal development of their nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
... different expertise that are necessary fro a national development. Education is t...
^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...al aspect of any national developments. it is no doubt that for a ntion to develop...
^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s discipline can not be overemphasised. it is on this note that I quite disagree w...
^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...e disagree with the recommendation that the a nation should require all of its studen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...curriculum untill they enter college. it is a well known fact that interest and ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...curriculum untill they enter college. it is a well known fact that interest and ...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...iting their interest to specific areas. this is not in any way advantageous to any n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3046875 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11608102229 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53515625 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9274325661 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.888888889 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425645230675 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189688338596 0.0831039109588 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189813772134 0.0758088955206 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273637110835 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122928876776 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.