A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Different countries have different forms of education systems. While some countries mandate that all the students of the nation study a common national curriculum, other countries provide leniency for their states to adopt their own curriculum for the students. The prompt suggests that a nation should make it mandatory for its students to study the same national curriculum until they reach college. I agree with the prompt and feel that making the students across a nation study the same curriculum during their initial phase of education would be more beneficial than otherwise for the following reasons.
Firstly, following a common nation-wide curriculum ensures consistency in the knowledge that the students gain during schooling. This consistency in the knowledge can play a vital role in the lives of the students as they embark for their higher studies. Let me expound on what I mean exactly. College is a place where students from different parts of a country come together to study. And in college, it is not only the way the professors teach that shapes the future of the students but also how students collaborate with each other to aggrandize their learning experience and make best out of their collaboration. Students who have studied the same curriculum in the school can easily match each others thought process and this parity in the thought process will aid for them to have collaborations. They will be on the go right from the beginning and such collaborations can make their college experience fruitful as well as enjoyable. Who knows, they even may be on to the next big thing in the world. Thus, a common national curriculum can help foster better collaborations in the college that otherwise would not have been possible.
Secondly, a common national curriculum ensures that there is no regional biasness introduced into the curriculum. For example, let us take the case of India. If states are given latitude in forming their own curriculum, they might inculcate some fallacious ideas into their curriculum to make the students feel proud about their own state. Such discrepencies in curriculums across a nation can hinder the feeling of unity among the students eventually leading to the destruction of integrity of a nation. Thus, a common national curriculum proves to be beneficial to a nation.
However, having a common national curriculum entails the curriculum be as comprehensive as possible. When there is great diversity in the nation, like in India, there is a possibility that the curriculum becomes diluted and does not provide details into the specifics of each state, say in the subject of History. In such case, the states should come up with optional additional study material for their states only after being scrutinized by the national authorities.
To recapitulate, necessitating the students study a common national curriculum in the school helps to mantain consistency of knowledge of the students which can aid better collaborations in the college and prevents incidence of any regional biasness. However, to compensate for the dilution that may take place in a common national curriculum, the states can provide optional additional material only after validation by the national authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey might inculcate some fallacious ideas into their curriculum to make the studen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, i mean, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2737.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25335892514 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89820009824 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437619961612 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 864.9 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7108977017 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.652173913 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287876312821 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997607374578 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730703489247 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193660859747 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547675659382 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.