A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
People all have the potential to grow up to become experts in various fields. They all have different talents and characteristics which may be enhanced or diminished through the educations they receive. I believe that the nation should enable students to pursue their own interests instead of forcing them to study the same national curriculum.
First of all, making it mandatory for the students to take the monolithic curriculum would indicate that the nation believes all students should consist the same skills when they become an adult. However, all children are born with different types of talents, such as artistic, scientific, and literary talents. The curriculum should be capable of enhancing their spectacular abilities, instead of forcing them to be good in all studies regardless of their talents. For example, I would like to mention a child who has extraordinary scientific talents but does not consist of any literary talents. If so, forcing him/her to take courses in literary due to having to take the monolithic courses would cause the child to falter in the class. He/she would constantly receive low grades in the literary course, making him/her to eventually start feeling diffident in his/her talent which could also affect in her performance in science classes. On the contrary, if the child had been allowed to take the courses he/she wishes to pursue, it would enable the child to florish in a certain field, making him/her becoming an expert in that area.
Moreover, if the students were required to take the same national curriculums regardless of their interests or talents, it would alter them into having stark personalities. None of the people would be salient in certain fields and would be able to perform similar tasks that are parallel to all the other people. However, for the nation to prosper in various fields and enhance the overall nation's welfare, it needs certain erudite people in each fields. For example, prestigious scientists may develop much more efficient and environment friendly technologies, doctors would be able to cure ill patients and ensure that all the people stay healthy through their lives, and celebrated writers can present novels that helps people stay imaginative or introduce non-fictions that can also educate people. However, if the nation makes it compulsory for children to take the same monolithic courses, it would make it impossible for them to become eminent in certain fields.
Last but not least, it is also necessary to be discerned with the consequences students might face when they were to attend colleges after taking the same curriculum. College is a place where students choose the courses as they desire and enable them to pursue their interests with free will. However, because the students were taught the same courses regardless of their interests and talents, their own will would have diminished and no longer would they remember what they had wished to study. Also, they would have lost the ability to decide for themselves, because they were never taught to decide. In this status, it would be extremely confounding for them to suddenly having to search what they wish to pursue and having to choose courses they would like to take in colleges. The nation would have to allow children to start practicing the ability to decide and let them look for what they would like to pursue as an adult in order to have them prepared for college.
To sum up, forcing the students to take the monolithic curriculum may have malignant consequences, such as nation not being able to flourish due to lack of erudite experts in various fields, students not being ready to attend colleges, and students always being diffident. Due to such reasons, I believe it is consequential for the nation to allow students to take the courses as they wish, instead of making it imperative to take the same national curriculum.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 58
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t50
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that regi64
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th63
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, for example, such as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3254.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 642.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06853582555 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03365860172 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61197258636 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.409657320872 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1002.6 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5325821015 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.47826087 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9130434783 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206075171247 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804368456253 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060318800231 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153731474356 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473868431024 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.