Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Leaders sometimes come to the point where they need to choose what is the most apropos decision in situations. In such situations, having a standard can inhibit them from wandering out of line. I believe that it is mandatory for the leaders to be committed to principles and objectives and should only compromise with the principles when exceptions need be accepted.
First of all, being committed to principles and objectives makes it much easier for leaders to not be manipulated by others. There are many people around the leaders who seek for the taste of power and wish to utilize that power through controlling the leader. Such people can compel the public to oppose to principles in order to grasp what they desire, even if it is for an unjust purpose.
Furthermore, having principles may maintain leaders to forbid themselves from utilizing power for their selfish purposes. Having the power to control the society may be potent to those who are dogmatic and without the advice of the principles and objectives, they can easily challenge the moral and ethical limits. For example, the former president of the United States, Donald Trump was known be a very doctrinaire leader who ignored all the principles and utilized the power to alter the society in ways that were perceived as a positive decision. He proclaimed war in a haste on China without being discerned with following the rules which asserted to be cautious when exclaiming war. He also continuously exposed himself without wearing a mask during Covid-19 pandemic, when it was lucidly written on the principle to always wear a mask when out in the public. Eventually, many advisors and the public turned their backs on him, having relinquished from the hope of making him a better president. He was known to be the worst president ever in the United States. If he had simply followed the principles and listened to the objectives, he would have made much better decisions and would not have caused such hatred from people.
Last but not least, even though the it is mandatory for the leaders to always be committed to principles, there could be situations where following the rules may not be a germane solution. Especially, when people's lives that are not protected by the objectives and only depends on the leaders choice. For example, in South Korea, principles do not ensure enough protection to innocent women who got involved in truculent transgressions caused by men. The law has the tendency of forgiving the men with unreasonable reasons such as he had been drunk or he must have had some traumatic experiences during his youth. Due to this, one of the most morbid criminal bailed out of jail after several short years and continued with his criminality to other women. The public strongly avowed that such transgression should be harshly punished. However, the leader, who was so deeply immersed in following the principles, did not give an exception to this man which led to many women still fearing of being caught up in similar criminality to this day. If the leader had provided an exception with amalgamating the principle and public opinion, it would given us a much better consequence.
To sum up, it is compulsory for leaders to be committed to following the principles and objectives, because it inhibits them from utilizing the power in dogmatic ways and helps them to not be manipulated by several selfish people. However, he/she should provide exceptions on certain situations by compromising with the public's opinion and the principles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere perceived as a positive decision. He proclaimed war in a haste on China witho...
^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...eople. Last but not least, even though the it is mandatory for the leaders to always ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1143, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
... principle and public opinion, it would given us a much better consequence. To sum u...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ain situations by compromising with the publics opinion and the principles.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, for example, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2944.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 590.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98983050847 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92848004997 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75055242421 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476271186441 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 918.9 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1368743717 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254965122077 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079843762512 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552779062116 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171432630011 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478848725358 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.