A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education forms the backbone of a nation, the nations progress and development depends highly upon the literacy rate and skills of it's individuals. Education sector forms a major sector of the national policy with considerable amount of resources and budget allocated to it. Different states within a country adopt different policies and strategies when it comes to forming the cirriculum and overall process of education. Each focusing on different aspects, which depend heavily on the geography of the region and the history too. The cirriculum of every state differs from another based on a lot of regional factors and the skills which the industry in that region needs.
Reecently there has been a proposition stating -we should form a policy that every student in the nation has to study the same cirriculum. This proposition claims that uniformity in the cirriculum will ensure that every student receives equal amount of education and will develop the same skills. This will ensure that we have a common basis to evaluate all individuals once they complete their education and move towards professional life. I do not completely agree with this idea, while it does seem as a good idea initially, to have a common cirriculum for everyone it certainly has some drawbacks.
To exercise same cirriculum we must consider some factors. Firstly, how would you define a cirriculum that makes sure of covering all skills and aspects. It would surely thwart the diversity aspect of education. For example - If all students of a nation have same cirriculum which means all of them have the same skillset and knowledge. The industry today is ever growing with new technologies been developed everyday, will these students having same skills be able to cope up with the change? Would we have enough subjects Having a different set of subjects and studies ensures that each and everyone gets a variety of knowledge and thus skills.
Secondly keeping the curriculum diverse adds a lot of opportunities. In a state which has huge number of IT Companies and jobs, a student in college will have a penchant towards coding and learning computer skills, he might want to pursue a career in IT. In this case having a common cirriculum would prove detrimental because he would not be more interested in learning economics or accounts, but he still has to study it because the cirriculum dictates it. Thus having a common education policy stymies acquiring new skills. A policy which is flexible, can attend to the new needs of the industry and thus have an increase in the human skills and resources.
A major advantage claimed by the proponents of common cirriculum policy is that it will induce convention and set up a seamless process, which can be modelled and replicated efficiently. While it is true that having a common policy would reduce operational complexity of designing the cirriculum because there would be a central policy, different states and colleges need to consider various factors that have been mentioned above. The pros and cons of such policy need to be rigorously evaluated before adopting it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ion forms the backbone of a nation, the nations progress and development depends highly...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when it comes to forming the cirriculum and overall process of education. Each f...
^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ng with new technologies been developed everyday, will these students having same skills...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, as to, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07212475634 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71739673773 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48343079922 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7106283166 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.130434783 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3043478261 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181974996224 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576259592359 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728881482035 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103021312991 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465964557919 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.