A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
The author here claims that all the students should study the same national curriculum until they enter college. I mostly disagree with this position mentioned by the author for the following reasons mentioned, which I will eluciadate below. Nevertheless, I do concede that there might be cases where we need to have similar cirriculums for different students to get a better personal growth.
To begin with, as we all know and agree with the postion that "every child is different" and hence, has different likings and tendencies, the author should consider this point in his cliam. For example, if one of the child does not enjoy maths at all, in such a case we cannot force him/her to study a cirriculum which does cointain maths at a higher extent. And in an other example, there might be a case where a student likes math and does not enjoy social science, in such a case we cannot force him to the similar cirriculm as the first child, it would be unjustice to both. So the author should consider every child as different human with different liking, and hence should be provided with different cirriculum.
In addition to this, we have different students with physical or mental disabilities, what about them? We cannot teach them the same cirriculum as the normal students. For examle, in India we call such students as "special children" and we teach them some special cirriculum, based on their physical and mental capabilities, we send them to special schools. The author here cannot just deny the fact that such students do exist and the need some special attention in their childhood. Hence they cannot be taught the same cirriculum as the normal students are been taught in school.
Lastly, just like every coin has two sides, the above prompt has a positive consequence as well. By teaching every student the same curriculum, we can have advantages. For example, all the students would get equal amount of exposure in their childhood which would obviously be beneficial for them in their later future.
To conclude, the author should think about the points mentioned above and rethink about his claim of having a national curriculum for the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n such a case we cannot force him/her to study a cirriculum which does cointain m...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...intain maths at a higher extent. And in an other example, there might be a case where a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not enjoy social science, in such a case we cannot force him to the similar cirri...
^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e special attention in their childhood. Hence they cannot be taught the same cirricul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98365122616 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64970369991 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487738419619 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1345598709 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3125 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192813816304 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806466104467 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098443282371 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13234469678 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663985888237 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.