In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
What is the world without imagination? Is there a new invention without imagination? Wouldn’t life just be rudimentary without imagination? Is imagination more important than education? Is imagination even possible without education? The above prompt argues that, imagination is superior to knowledge in most of the professions and academic fields. I mostly disagree with the position regarded by the author for the following reasons mentioned which I will elucidate below. Nevertheless, I do concede that imagination in some cases is as important as knowledge.
Is one even able to imagine new ideas or concepts without having prior knowledge about them? For instance, a science student, who does not have any knowledge about the subject. Would he be able to make plausible invention related to the subject? Would he be able to imagine more newer ideas? No, he won’t be able to do so. Without having any basic knowledge about the field of study, we won’t be able to think or imagine about it practically. The latest example of this is, the corona virus, would the scientists have discovered the vaccines for the novel corona virus without having the actual knowledge about it. We by sitting home could only have imagined about having such a vaccine but, the scientists who in practical gain the knowledge of the virus are able to make the real vaccines. Hence Imagination has not really possible without having no basic idea about the subject. Similarly, only imagination would not let us bring things into practical existence without having the essential knowledge about it.
Just like they say every coin has two sides. The above notion is actually even possible in some creative fields. Like for example, while writing a play, the writer has to imagine about the story and characters. And having the knowledge about the characters is secondary in such a case. Also in the case of the director of the play, imagining about how the performance would actually look on stage, how would the characters enter on stage is of course more important.
But in academic fields, as the name suggests 'academic- related to knowledge' theoretical knowledge and imaginative powers go hand in hand. Only imagining things would not lead to actually create them, knowledge about what you are thinking is also essential.
‘Lose some gain some’ is a true principle. Same goes with the statement above, imagining things is not possible without having actual knowledge about the related field. And without imagination there could be no progress in the same field. Hence, both knowledge and imagination are equally important for in any field to make progress, may it be some professional field or an academic one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...e world without imagination? Is there a new invention without imagination? Wouldn’t life just...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'newer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: newer
...he subject? Would he be able to imagine more newer ideas? No, he won’t be able to do so. W...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 792, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rus are able to make the real vaccines. Hence Imagination has not really possible wit...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, second, similarly, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, of course, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12641083521 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72203128485 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460496613995 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.515738539 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3103448276 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.275862069 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27586206897 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342451403965 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105913409594 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101678742284 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21912812875 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105455133024 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.