Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years
Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
Is there any surest path to success? In my opinion, there are many factors that contribute to success of any business or any person. The author claims that in any field the people in power should step down after 5 years as the surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. I mostly disagree with the claim and reason stated by the author. However, I do concede that in some cases revitalization may help an enterprise give a new ideas which might help them to succeed.
To begin with, people in power must not step down after 5 years. Although, a five year period is sufficient to gain enough experience but, also need to use the knowledge and acumen gain through this experience, so stepping down would not be a wise decision. For example, a teacher is considered the best when he or she has been teaching for a long time, in fact, in India, our professors work till their age 60 or sometimes more. In this case, would it be wise that a teacher retires after teaching for 5 years. No the more time you work, the more knowledge you gain about your field, the more experience you gain, the more it contributes to your success.
In addition to this, there is no sure path that contributes to success, revitalization brings new faces and new ideas but, it is not guaranteed that revitalization brings success alongside. The knowledge gained through experience, the hard work done, the perseverance are the main factors that may contribute or any enterprises success. The new, those who come in power, do not have necessary experience, it would again require a few years for them to get insights. In this way, it would become a recurring process. Perhaps, those who already posses this experience may guide new ones, in this way an enterprise would get both experience and revitalization.
Lastly, the more experienced a person in any particular field is, the more it benefits that enterprise. I fact, if experience wasn't an important factor why would comes while recruiting new employees consider people with experience more eligible to a position. Hence, stepping down after five years is not wise, in fact, getting upgraded to a bigger position than before after a five year period would help an enterprise in a much better way.
In conclusion, stepping down after five years is not wise and revitalization through new leadership is not the surest path to success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...hor. However, I do concede that in some cases revitalization may help an enterprise g...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'idea'?
Suggestion: idea
...ation may help an enterprise give a new ideas which might help them to succeed. To...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...her retires after teaching for 5 years. No the more time you work, the more knowle...
^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
...main factors that may contribute or any enterprises success. The new, those who come in pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... that enterprise. I fact, if experience wasnt an important factor why would comes whi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...nce wasnt an important factor why would comes while recruiting new employees consider...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8309178744 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77242079543 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.520166298 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448440236718 0.243740707755 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159872491648 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170931769232 0.0758088955206 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304030714039 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170734788438 0.0667264976115 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.