A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
It has been a significant controversy whether educational service should be provided to all citizens ever since the emergence of the concept of modern nation. Although it takes a considerable amount of research in terms of evaluating the specific history of national implementations of education, it shall be not so difficult to assess the fundamental risks and potential harms that result from standardized national curriculum. This essay will demonstrate several evidence and reasons why problems outweigh the advantages of such a governmental strategy.
To begin with, some may argue that national curricula are likely to alleviate the social, cultural and economical inequality among citizens. As Pierre Bourdieu states, there exists a signicant correlation between social mobility and education. That is, if the nation, functioning as a subject who is in charge of alleviating capital inequality, does not intervene the specific fields of basic needs, it is likely that stratification of the society will be solidified and the democratic ethics might be consequentially harmed. Thus, it is acknowledgeable that governments have the responsibility in enhancing the basic suppliants of educational means to all citizens, which is mostly implemented in an uniform way.
Nevertheless, applying national curriculim to all students contain serious risks as the contents of education will be consisted of full of ideological propaganda. For example, we are informed that the Soviet Union has been collapsed due to intense corruption and a misfeasance of management. One of the many reasons why the governmental management was not efficient was that the educational policies contained only the materials that highly praises the current regime, instead of providing the people with tools for critical thoughs and evaluations. The means of national education are in many times as a function to infuse people the ideology. Therefore, if the requirement of studying the same national curriculum is realized, it may be risky in the long-term, as people might lose sight of critically analyzing the position of themselves and the nation as well.
Furthermore, providing the same tools to all students may cause a falsified illusion that the society is equal and fair to everyone, so that the myth of fairness shall mislead to neglecting the essential problems of social structure. Even though it shall be an important manual to strive for the ethics of fairness, only by providing the basic materials equally does not lead to a society in which equality has been achieved. For instance, students with affluent infrastructure and a benevolent family environment are likely to show great accomplishments compared to students who lack such elements. That is, it is indeed the ability to utilize the materials that determines the levels of being educated, and in many cases it is determined by exterior support.
The conclusion now stands that providing the same national curriculum to every student may be one option to enhance the basic living conditions of the citizens, nevertheless it contains several serious problems and risks when implemented. The essay illustrated several factors of such risks and strongly disagrees that education should not be simply done through uniformed contents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...curriculum. This essay will demonstrate several evidence and reasons why problems outweigh the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 697, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an uniform way" with adverb for "uniform"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l citizens, which is mostly implemented in an uniform way. Nevertheless, applying national cur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 700, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...itizens, which is mostly implemented in an uniform way. Nevertheless, applying ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47047244094 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14728937911 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521653543307 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 888.3 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3857683285 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.388888889 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223626929277 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691339056734 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708515339832 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127837654035 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516963546156 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.