Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Scientific developments such as the technological advances in genetics, neuroscience, cybernetics and so on have led us to an unprecedented world in which numerous debates arose as a result. As stated in the prompts, ongoing debates concern the relationship between scientific development and the knowledge of the world. While some argue that such a process has allowed us to grasp intuitive thoughts about the environment, some contend that it has only resulted in a chaotic disorder. This essay is going to demonstrate specific details and evidence in regard to evaluating the scientific commitment in its world.
Admittedly, new discoveries of scientific inquiry have resulted in more complex ideas and questions. Once ignorance is supplanted to a speculative finding in certain fields, it is likely that we might face changes in the original conceptions, including the quintessential premise of what defines human beings and the environment in general. For instance, we now acknowledge that we are not fundamentally different to the so-called artificial intelligence considering the mechanisms of our thought cycle. That is, several neuroscientists and A.I technologists have found that our intelligence is analogous to that of the algorithms of google, which consists of the cybernetical feature of motion in informatics. Information is accumulated and developed with the help of its constant cycle of feedback. At the very beginning of such inquiry, several controversies have aroused due to the confusion of defining human beings and distinguishing humanity from its artificial culture. The finding has challenged the essence of the belief of our existence and the relation that we have with nature. This may be one of the many examples in which controversial ideas were introduced that resulted in a complicated situation. Thus we may conclude that scientific discoveries might bring us to an ever more challenging world due to the confusion of fundamental understandings of the world.
Nevertheless, this confusion may, in the end, generate a considerable amount of insights that narrows the gap between our existence and the logical thoughts we accumulated so far. That is, even though the contradictory and controversial discussions may cause serious headaches and nightmares in the short-term, we may evolve, if stretching the time in a longer perspective, into a more sapient echelon throughout a series of contemplation. For instance, once when Copernicus had discovered the revolving of earth around the sun, we are well informed that his findings have led to a conflicting condition of the society, as the priests and the politicians failed to situate themselves as the center of the world. The whole premise had to be collapsed in order to state the new finding as a scientific truth with full credit and justification. However, we are also well informed with the eventual changes that Copernicus’ findings led to. Without his findings and controversies, we may have never stood in the current condition in which Einstein’s relativity theory and Newton’s principles are regarded as logical facts. Thus, it is fully acceptable to consider the constant change of our perspectives due to scientific inquiries.
In conclusion, we may now require a balancing perspective in assessing informative and technological changes throughout recent developments. That is, while it may be challenging to face the formidable and abrupt change in our established viewpoints, the discoveries may lead us to a phase in which our curiosity will be fulfilled with wondering ideas and findings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
... That is, several neuroscientists and A.I technologists have found that our intel...
^
Line 2, column 1216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...at resulted in a complicated situation. Thus we may conclude that scientific discove...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rspectives due to scientific inquiries. In conclusion, we may now require a bala...
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'facing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: facing
...s. That is, while it may be challenging to face the formidable and abrupt change in our...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3043.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45340501792 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36581707459 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 952.2 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7216205572 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.318181818 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204141549315 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620613273265 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697268128063 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129463535065 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569908028274 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.