Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better
understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to
us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realised.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
From the discovery of fire in ancient times to now human life has developed significantly. In the present day, science occupies everything in our lives and we have a better understanding of the world around us. The above prompt sets out that though scientific discoveries help us to apprehend the world around us, because of it we can understand that the world is more complex than we ever realized. While I concede that scientific discoveries give us a lucid illegible idea about the world in my opinion, I mostly agree that it makes out understanding of our world more complex for three reasons.
To begin with, scientific discoveries make our life easier and enhance our understanding of the world in different ways but they also render us a complex view of the simplest things around us. Let’s take an example that previously we did not understand the reasoning behind Cholera which was so pernicious that millions of people perished because of it. But after discovering the scientific reason behind it we can understand the more complex nature of the simplest thing like water around us. The above example shows how science is embedded in every minute matter of our surroundings and sometimes it reveals its complex nature which sometimes provides us with a bigger picture of our world.
Furthermore, scientific discoveries aggrandize our understanding of human philology which helps us to understand surrounding people more pellucidly. For example, a person may seem happy outside but he can undergo many mental disorders like severe depression which is malignant in several ways. This example illustrates that scientific discoveries help us to broaden our view in a more complex form about human nature that everything is not right what seems outside. Though science makes our comprehension of the world more convoluted, it helps us to understand the complexity of the simplest things which helps us to prosper.
However, sometimes science makes simpler things too complex even though there is no harm if we view it as normal. Because of scientific development, everything is in our hand reach thus sometimes we tend to comprehend simpler things in more sinuous ways. For example, people consider things more sophisticated if it has complex structure or complex algorithm with it. Moreover, in some cases, people tend to add some scientific propaganda to make it more complex. The above examples show that though science makes our everyday life more facile but science’s comprehensiveness sometimes back fired at us.
Despite these reasons, science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized and has its merit such as better comprehension of the reasons behind deceases, more complex structure of human nature, etc which overshadow the possible disadvantages which are far more lucrative in nature. Thus a complex scientific understanding of the world around us is necessary without assuming everything around us is complex.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...which are far more lucrative in nature. Thus a complex scientific understanding of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22916666667 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92274366915 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3119906075 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.105263158 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2631578947 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467322106768 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183516532142 0.0831039109588 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111353124768 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323010158495 0.150359130593 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944392026357 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...which are far more lucrative in nature. Thus a complex scientific understanding of t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22916666667 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92274366915 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3119906075 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.105263158 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2631578947 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467322106768 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183516532142 0.0831039109588 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111353124768 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323010158495 0.150359130593 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944392026357 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.