A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The education curriculum is different in different countries. But, there are countries where the curriculum is not the same throughout the nation until students enter college. This might confuse the students as well as the universities while admitting students from different states. Therefore, I mostly agree with the claim that all students must study the same curriculum until they enter college mainly for two reasons. However, this might not be true in all circumstances and there are certain scenarios where the curriculum needs to be altered to suit the interest of students.
Firstly, most students do not decide their career path when they are in high school. Therefore, these students must be given an opportunity to explore all the fields of study and make sure they have covered the pre-requisites in all fields of study. This would help them when they finally decide on their field of interest since they would have already covered the basics of that particular field. For instance, if a student decides to pursue his undergraduate degree in the field of Electronics engineering, he would have already covered the basics during high school which would enable him to easily progress further in that domain. This is possible only if the curriculum is the same for all students. If not, he would have skipped the subjects related to Electronics during his high school which would hamper his progress. This is not only true for the field of Electronics engineering, but also for various other fields like computer science, history, physics, etc. Different students might pursue their undergraduate in different fields. Therefore, it would be helpful if diverse subjects are made mandatory for students during their schooling.
Secondly, not all countries are capable of providing all the subjects that students wish for. Small countries like Iran and Sri Lanka might not be able to provide a diverse set of curricula to their students. For instance, one student might want to study Japanese during High school and another student might wish to study Spanish. Under circumstances like these, it would be impossible for schools to find teachers who teach these subjects. Therefore, having the same curriculum for all the students in the country till High school seems to be pragmatic and an economical option.
However, there are scenarios where providing a flexible curriculum could help students with their future endeavors. For instance, if a student decides that he is going to pursue computer science as his Undergraduate major, he would prefer to choose subjects related to computer science during his senior year. Therefore, it would be useless for him to study history and economics during his senior year. Under these circumstances, providing a flexible curriculum would be a better choice.
Therefore, I believe that having the same curriculum throughout the country till high school is necessary because it will assist students in choosing their career paths. However, this argument is subjective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had skipped'?
Suggestion: had skipped
...s the same for all students. If not, he would have skipped the subjects related to Electronics dur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27385892116 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70473861161 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412863070539 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 772.2 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1129864426 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.68 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.28 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190443129897 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683866055523 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647819528387 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121616792248 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764299777437 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.