A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The future of a nation can be determined by the quality of education the next generation is receiving. It is important to have skilled professionals in all of the essential fields for the nation, and also make suere that the students are not put to immense pressure to reach expectations. I strongly agree with the prompt that all the students have to study the same curriculum untill they enter college for two reasons.
Firstly, having the same curriculum untill college gives student more exposure to different career paths they can choose. Deciding which career path to choose at an earlier level, would put the students to huge dilemma given the little knowledge that they have regarding various fields. It is not surprising that a person who was not interested in a subject initially, might be fascinated by the same once he/she starts studying about it, or otherwise. For example, let us consider a student who was never excited about math, but was fascinated by the various phenomenon discussed in baisc physics, and chose a career path in physics. He would later be bombarded with high level calculus that is needed to explain these physics phenomenon (that he was one enthrilled by) and could regret his decision to choose this career path without having in-depth knowledge of what he would be facing in the future. So it is important that students should be getting a good idea about various fields before entering college before he/she would be knowledgable enough to choose a major in college. This would also prevent 'passionate' parents from forcing their 'dreams' onto their children.
Secondly, this would also put all students entering college in a uniform level which would greatly help in designing the college curriculum, where the students would be developing their skill-set specific to their career paths. For example, if the students of a particular college are coming from very diverse backgrounds where a few set of students are good at , but the other set were not. It would be a waste of time to start teaching math required for the course from the start. This would not only hamper the excitement of the students who already know the subject, but would also be an unfair advantage during the tests. Hence the uniformity of curriculum before entering college, would also help after entering college to keep things not only fair but only effecient.
One could say that in the current highly competitive world that we live in, shouldn't one start preparing himself/herself to get an edge over his peers at an early stage. But, if a uniform national curriculum is followed, it would also ensure that no one gets an headstart. Thereby decreasing the burden the students have to face at a younger age and thereby helps in preotecting the mental health of coming generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ortant to have skilled professionals in all of the essential fields for the nation, and al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'physics'' or 'physic's'?
Suggestion: physics'; physic's
...alculus that is needed to explain these physics phenomenon that he was one enthrilled b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun set seems to be countable; consider using: 'few sets'.
Suggestion: few sets
...g from very diverse backgrounds where a few set of students are good at , but the other...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... where a few set of students are good at , but the other set were not. It would be...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e an unfair advantage during the tests. Hence the uniformity of curriculum before ent...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ghly competitive world that we live in, shouldnt one start preparing himself/herself to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., it would also ensure that no one gets an headstart. Thereby decreasing the burde...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95531914894 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60692128846 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506382978723 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9467448937 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.388888889 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282416516591 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944227626573 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919911490675 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183076762823 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109896000463 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.