A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Schools are considered the temple of knowledge, where students should not be restricted on what they learn. Every student has their own interests, and fixing the curriculum for all will not help in general. Similarly, in a school, students come from all walks of life, hence the same curriculum might be helpful for one and difficult for another. Moreover, in today’s world, competition has increased so much that, students right from their early classes starts preparing for their career and a fixed syllabus can hinder their aspirations.
Firstly, Let us take the example of three students who wants to become a scientist, an athelete and a film director, respectively. Now if the education board were to include chemistry as a mandatory course for students in secondary classes then the course will be helpful for the student who wants to become a scientist. But what about the other two students? Clearly Chemistry won’t help the other two in their career. Perhaps Arts will be useful for film director and health education course will benefit the athelete. Thus it will be much more useful, if students have the choice of selecting the subjects they want to study in their secondary classes.
Second, I will take example of a school situated in the state of Kerala and a school situated in the state of Rajasthan in India. The regional language of Kerala is Malyalam and the regional language of Rajasthan is Hindi. Now consider a scenario where the education board decideds to make sanskrit as mandatory course to promote it based on historical and mythological reasons. Now a student in Rajasthan who’s mother toungue is hindi will have no problem in adjusting to sanskrit as sanskrit is close enough to hindi. Whereas, students in Kerala will have hard time understanding sanskrit as these students are not very well versed with either hindi or sanskrit. Instead introducing malyalam literature will be more useful.
Lastly and most importantly, today the competition has increased a lot. If we were to fix the curriculum then students will have to study both the syllabus and give extra time to prepare for competition. Which will give extra pressure to them and both their regular studies and their preparation will be qualified.
In conclusion, I will say that fixing the curriculum will bring many challenges then solve some. Every student is different pertaining to their interest, background, career. So we should have a flexible curriculum that will help students from all walks of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ation course will benefit the athelete. Thus it will be much more useful, if student...
^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...l versed with either hindi or sanskrit. Instead introducing malyalam literature will be...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09178743961 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73809504241 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5304046597 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8181818182 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120824273925 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425991422025 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386657019811 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796695300078 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336838451589 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.