National Curriculum that means you are indeed standardizing the curriculum, so this standardization would be plausible and would make sense if the Nation is smaller in terms of population and size. If the nation size is big then this recommendation wouldn't be the best bet. So the recommendation is limited and applicable to only some scenarios.
In some nations like Nepal, Italy or Pakistan, where there isn't much diversity in the people in terms of language, customs, ethnicity, religion. So formulating the standardized curriculum would be easy and wouldn't be much friction among the people accepting the Idea. For example, In a nation like Nepal, where people follow Buddhism, so incorporating the Buddhism would be feasible and accepted by people. In the same way, bringing the Islamic principles in the curriculum and standardizing it would be plausible and accepted by people of Pakistan.
However, this idea wouldn't help in case of Nations like India, United States etc. because of diversity. For example, Yoga which considered to a tool for inner engineering and tool for enlightenment, considered in some way it is associated with the Hindu Religion. So in a school in Chennai, the curriculum includes the Yoga as a part of Curriculum, but by doing so the school has broken the headlines for forcefully imposing the Hinduism. So to implement this to the whole nation, based on prior example, it is quite sure that isn't plausible. So more diverse the people are, the perceptions are different so making the standardized format would be difficult and it becomes some kind of enforcement on the people.
By standardizing, you won't be specific and contextual anymore. Suppose consider the Nation like India, which has about 28 states and about 1000 plus language. And each region as specific history and background. So when you're standardizing then you won't talk about anything about historical significance about that region anymore but overall country. Then connecting the dots would be difficult. I feel that you can only connect if you specific and contextual.
So I would be that given recommendation would be plausible only in some scenarios and so the recommendation is limited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...maller in terms of population and size. If the nation size is big then this recomm...
^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...on size is big then this recommendation wouldnt be the best bet. So the recommendation ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...e Nepal, Italy or Pakistan, where there isnt much diversity in the people in terms o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...andardized curriculum would be easy and wouldnt be much friction among the people accep...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ople of Pakistan. However, this idea wouldnt help in case of Nations like India, Uni...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...on prior example, it is quite sure that isnt plausible. So more diverse the people a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., it is quite sure that isnt plausible. So more diverse the people are, the percep...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...pecific history and background. So when youre standardizing then you wont talk about ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, for example, i feel, kind of, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20505617978 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07175861433 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7026990851 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.65 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15911935661 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536529739546 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398618965642 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966054414402 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401126249292 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.