In the modern age, the education plays an important role in the individual career. The national curriculum is common in countries all over the world. From my position, while admitting the necessity and benefits of the national curriculum, I believe it could cause several negative effect on the student.
Firstly, the national curriculum does provide benefit for the students. One benefits is to enlighten the children and provide solid basement for further study. Since a national curriculum are usually designed by experts from various aspects of the society, it provides elemental knowledge structure such as basic algebra or English grammar, for further study on any particular field, which can be hardly replaced by any other form of education. Additionally, the national curriculum also offers a simple standard to evaluate the students academic abilities, regardless of their class, family background and races. Simple and blunt as it is, however, it still save great resource on selecting the proper student to enter higher education institute.
However, problems are still remain in the national curriculum for several negative effect caused by it. To begin with, an uniform evaluating standard to all the student could reduce the diversity among the student. The reason lies in the fact that given the monotony standard only suppose good score in some particular subject, students would pay great effort to those subjects without considering their own interested field. To make things worst, even if they reject to subordinate those standards, their parents would push them to do so in order to let their kids have a bright future. In this way, the diversity among student could greatly reduce, just as the university students in the China where the GaoKao, a higher education examination, has determinate power on selecting eligible students to university. Since the national curriculum do not help the student to find the field they like, many student might lost themselves in the campus.
To compose the advantage and disadvantage of the national curriculum, educators should come up with a solution in which the national curriculum performs still as the foundation of the education whereas the diversity of students remain to be an important feature among the students. For example, In USA, the high school students are enable to choose their optional courses besides the subjects. They also have comparative low academic pressure, making it possible to research in the field they are interested in after class.
To warp it up, it is hard to choose the side at the first glance, especially given the complicated situation in the real world. Yet after consideration, I give my opinion as the national curriculum is necessary in the condition that the diversity among students is guaranteed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...e and blunt as it is, however, it still save great resource on selecting the proper ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...titute. However, problems are still remain in the national curriculum for several ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ive effect caused by it. To begin with, an uniform evaluating standard to all the ...
^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...e, In USA, the high school students are enable to choose their optional courses beside...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29977628635 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76396195865 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539149888143 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.134159201 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.684210526 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327017564116 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103136721572 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764382747108 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183948215533 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388002086892 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.