Since the time we have standardised our education system, simultaneously we have also been trying to perfect it to achieve our target of inculcating more and more people into this atmoshpere of learning and growing, so that they can become a functional and integral part of the society in the future. The first step that every nation took towards this endeavor was to introduce a standard academic curriculum which is usually unique for each country which was necessary for providing similar education to all without any general bias. But, in many countries (such as India), there are multiple educational boards having their own curriculum apart from the national curriculum. I do not agree with the recommendation to a certain reasons and will provide my reasons for it henceforth.
One of the benefit that the students in a country, such as mine where they have the multiple educational boards, is the option to elect an educational board according to the curriculum that they want to study. Each of the academic curriculums have its own unique way of making the students learn a topic from its fundamental to a more advanced basis. Therefore, the students have the choice to change their board if they are not comfortable with the one that they are currently enrolled in. This would not have been possible if there would only have been one national curriculum for all of its students.
Another benefit that the students of a country which allows its students to select a single curriculum from multiple ones is the varied form of topics that they can teach sometimes with more focus on non-STEM subjects. For example, some boards in my country and their academic curriculum focuses more on subjects such as humanities, arts or literature apart from the basic math and science courses. This provides a healthy learning enviornment to the students who are not adept in mathematics or science but want to, later in their future, opt for non-STEM fields such as journalism or a painter and to do that they will need to enter colleges which teaches them the subject that will help them in learning about such professions.
An argument can be made that this diverse number of curriculum each one of them focusing on different subjects may hamper the country's ability to formulate a standardised test which can help them in discerning capabilities of its students. I understand the concern that the argument raises but I still think it is more beneficial for a student's growth is to allow them to learn the subjects (i.e. the curriculum) that they prefer rather then forcing a single national curriculum onto them.
I do agree that providing the students of a country the option to elect from multiple academic curriculum will raise many problems for the education ministry of a country. But I also believe that requiring a single national curriculum for all of its students may become detrimental for a country in the long run. Life is all about the freedom of making our own choices, why don't we extend that same concept for the benefit of the students of a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'teach'.
Suggestion: sometimes teach
...the varied form of topics that they can teach sometimes with more focus on non-STEM subjects. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...still think it is more beneficial for a students growth is to allow them to learn the su...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... the curriculum that they prefer rather then forcing a single national curriculum on...
^^^^
Line 9, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... freedom of making our own choices, why dont we extend that same concept for the ben...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, apart from, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90019193858 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69111167979 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437619961612 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7349161967 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.5625 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5625 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252538788666 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100441762319 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638652701263 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160382771986 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508415188684 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.