A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
According to statement, national curriculum is required for all the students until their graduate study starts. At some extent, I agree with the speaker's argument about national curriculum. However, national curriculum can put limit to various aspects of the states and the parents.
On one hand, national curriculum at early education life of student can bring out the common base for universities who provide graduate degree. Also, no student will be left behind thinking that students of one school have better advantage in getting into universities than theirs. It provides the common base for all the students across the nation. However, this national curriculum shouldn't stop the states if they want to introduce few subjects with respect to their state culture. Also, parents are free from taking any decision about their students if national curriculum is in place.
On the other hand, statement is not considering various other parameter where national curriculum can fail. Like, who will be the in-charge person to decide the national curriculum? If people from federal regulation are going to introduce this national curriculum then there are chances that they can take biased decisions considering more inclination to their states. This will fail to fulfill the purpose of national curriculum. Also, this national curriculum can hinder the parents' wish for their children to focus on specific subject. Moreover, it brings limitations for the students to not focus on their beloved subjects right from the beginning. For example, students might be interested in specific subject but they have to wait until they reach the college and because of this they might fail in various subject due to lack of interest.
In sum, national curriculum serves the great purpose of providing common base for all universities across nation to choose students. However, there are various limitation to this practice. parents can't control their students with respect to their curriculum. There are no guidelines that who will be the in-charge person for this national curriculum. So, national curriculum should consider these limitation and take the decision accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- As a vibrant community of learners dedicated to inclusive excellence, the students, faculty and staff at the University of Colorado Boulder seek to be open and respectful of contrasting beliefs and opinions. Every student has a unique life experience and 16
- Letter of recommendation 11
- The purpose of many advertisements is to make consumers want to buy a product so that they will 'be like' the person in the ad. This practice is effective because it not only sells products but also helps people feel better about themselves. 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the last year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the comp 43
- In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for large corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small general practice firms Even though large firms usual 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...tarts. At some extent, I agree with the speakers argument about national curriculum. How...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m at early education life of student can bring out the common base for universiti...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...tion. However, this national curriculum shouldnt stop the states if they want to introdu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rson to decide the national curriculum? If people from federal regulation are goin...
^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parents
...re various limitation to this practice. parents cant control their students with respec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...us limitation to this practice. parents cant control their students with respect to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this limitation' or 'these limitations'?
Suggestion: this limitation; these limitations
...So, national curriculum should consider these limitation and take the decision accordingly. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45562130178 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66184732514 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476331360947 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.287095623 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369871876939 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141286436475 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784517918534 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281317348895 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512220571113 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.