A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
Paraphrasing the given issue, it states that all the school going children should be taught the same national curriculum until they enter a higher level of education that is college. It is necessary that all students before joining a particular field of their interest in college have same level of intellectual while competing for a place in that field.
Students before entering college should be assessed on their level of intelligence acquired till that point and it can only be a fair assessment if they have all gone through the same education system. A student going through national board of education might be getting better and broader understanding of national affairs compared to a student going through a state board of education. This is under the assumption that the resources used by central board could be encompassing topics that can make the student truly eligible for national level competitive exams while the resources that state board uses could comprise of material that can make the student eligible for state level competitive exams only. If that is the case, a student from state board and a student from central board vie for an admission in college, it is fairly predictable that central board student would be selected.
Some may argue that given the fixed number of resources available in the nation, it is hard to provide the same national curriculum at all schools. While that is true, the fact that education is the true power a nation holds is equally true. Education is the single most important weapon a nation can use growth in economy, infrastructure and what not. A nation should realize the true significance of educating every child in a way that they are prescient of country's future. This is precisely the reason why any country should prioritize investing in education over anything else. Investing in same national curriculum for all of its students will result in not only equal capabilities for all but also more number of people working towards better results and better future of the nation as no one can deny the truth that future of a nation lies in the hands of today's children.
To recapitulate, I strongly agree that a nation should enforce same national curriculum for all of its students. Since students are a nation's true treasure, no country should hesitate in investing in overall development of all of its students equally. At the same time, no student should feel deprived of capabilities in applying for an area of their passion just because they did not go through a particular "type" of curriculum. The concept of levels of education should be eradicated
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...e resources that state board uses could comprise of material that can make the student elig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... student would be selected. Some may argue that given the fixed number of resource...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...levels of education should be eradicated
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0159453303 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74542003487 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457858769932 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9349125542 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4375 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8125 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445949021312 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168527801294 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108807165894 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315718925698 0.150359130593 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751527402333 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.