A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The statement presents a cogent position about teaching the students a uniform syllabus upto a certain point in their educational life. Educational curriculum is one of those topics that can be argued over in depth. From a country's perspective, this is undoubtedly a very delicate topic. Determining the specifications of the curriculum is a very daunting task. Beacause, usually there are many qualified personnel on the board, but sadly, they have different views. But this statement certainly poses a very thought provoking conundrum.
To speak about the merit, there are different types of area of specialization, yes, where some may go for engineering, some may go for social studies, some for economics etc. But if things can be seen from a slightltly meticulus perspective, it is evident that, whatever may the research field be, the general knowledge base is the same. If an example of this country can be provided, upto 8th grade, the students here are taught the same subjects. These include a sound knowledge of mathematics, English, Bangla, general science, social science and religious and moral studies. The students my go in different directions after that, sure, but at least they get to see how the subjects can vary from one to another. So, if they go for a particular area, they might know just beforehand that they will be entitled to do what kinds of things.
However, it is also true that upto 8th grade is a long time, let alone college. It can be argued that they are merely wasting the time that could have been put to better use a long time ago. So, why should the students spend their valuable time on something that they are not going to go through?
Well, there are some other governing factors here. First of all, the availability of seats in a particular department that the students want to get admitted. It is very common that the seatings are limited. So a competitiveness arises and whoever cannot keep up with the competition, fells out of the scenario. So they may go for something else. Secondly, sometimes the family pressures to students to pursue some other subjects.
In light of these reasons, there might be chances why the irregularity occurs.
Then again, in defending the statement, there should be a certain age to get started with anything. The government can emphasize on getting the students ready for specilized studies at an early age, however question remains on how much they can actually take or if their brains are fully capable of managing such tasks.
There should be a clear indication of how much should a student do at what stage of their educational journey. And certainly, the idea here seems very plausible because just burdening them may not get things done appropriately, where an easy going approach might just do the trick.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun personnel seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much qualified personnel', 'a good deal of qualified personnel'.
Suggestion: much qualified personnel; a good deal of qualified personnel
...nting task. Beacause, usually there are many qualified personnel on the board, but sadly, they have diff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...going approach might just do the trick.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, at least, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94291754757 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74863066314 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530655391121 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7842620638 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9230769231 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1923076923 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131177737978 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364553525561 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348365547186 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606077719564 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025703488363 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.