A national should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
One of the greatest struggles of a student in their early educational career is deciding what they want to pursue upon graduation. Some students have the liberty of knowing exactly what they want to achieve early on in their life, however the majority are still discovering what they are truly passionate about. A curriculum which incorporates a broad range of disciplines allows a student to explore the unknown. Additionally, education should be about equality. This is a time period for students in which they receive the same opportunity regardless of their backgrounds. Finally, should students study different curriculums, a dilemma would arise for college admissions assessing incoming graduates. As such, a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Students early on in their lives often believe they have their life planned ahead and set in stone. However, many may still find their intersts will change over the course of their studies. This could be due to experiences they encounter outside of the classroom, or even engaging in a subject in which they were never exposed to before. Say a student decides to study engineering from a young age. If that particular student were to partake in a more conrete curriculum which only encompassed courses such as mathematics, physics and chemistry, he or she may never realize that their true passion lies within history. This example outlines that students within a nation should all study the same curriculum to figure out exactly what it is they want to pursue later in college.
Education should be about equality. Students are to enter a classroom and learn regardless of what environment they were brought up in. It doesn't matter about what gender or ethnicity they are, every individual should receive the same opportunity. By allowing students from different backgrounds to study different curriculums, this brings up the concern of inequality. Imagine if wealthier families were to send their children to private schools such that they receive a better curriculum than someone less fortunate. This would bring an unfair advantage in learning upon graduation from the two students. By allowing students to study the same national curriculum despite of their upbringings, you create an environment where equality is emphasized.
Finally, having students study different curriculums results in an ethical dilemma for college admissions when assessing incoming graduates. Where does one draw the line between students that deserve to receive a unique curriculum from the norm? College admissions now no longer have a standard in which they can assess and compare students with another because they no longer follow the same curriculum. This may result in unfair bias between the admission office when admitting students with different curriculums. By having students study the same curriculum, you eliminate such bias and have a benchmark to fairly assess all incoming students.
Students studying the same curriculum will enable further learning to spark an individual's interests. It will teach students about discpline and work ethic, but most importantly, it will teach them about equality despite if some were more fortunate than others during their upbringing. It will present everyone the same and fair opportunity when applying to college. For these benefits, it is imperative that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...lanned ahead and set in stone. However, many may still find their intersts will change o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...environment they were brought up in. It doesnt matter about what gender or ethnicity t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2965.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 551.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38112522686 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77374661977 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464609800363 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 934.2 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2819316554 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.24137931 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72413793103 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469908182914 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145673422954 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192214072467 0.0758088955206 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297395342451 0.150359130593 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949974225656 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.