Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement proposes the passing of laws for the purpose of preserving areas known for their wilderness in their original state. While this claim may benefit the environment and animal population, it does not take into consideration the consequence of such actions to humankind. This makes it hard to agree with the claim.
Firstly, nations worldwide are experiencing an increase in population every day and consequently, the need for more living space has escalated as well. When such laws are passed, then the available space that the wilderness can provide will be of no use and likely result to some families being homeless.
Secondly, the government should consider the cost of fulfilling these laws. In order for the animal population and various types of plants to be preserved, then a certain amount of the nation’s budget will have to be utilized. If certain species suffer from a disease, then even more money will have to be used. This practice will only result in the negligence of other important issues that can affect the nation.
Some might, in support to the statement, assert that by passing these policies might save animals or plant species close to extinction, and preserve the origins of the nation. While this might be true, it does not change the fact that these species can be transported to certain agencies that would preserve the animals and plants better than when they were trying to survive and struggle in the wild.
In conclusion, indeed the passing of the laws for the preserving natural conditions of the wilderness areas would benefit the species, however the government should take into consideration, and how these laws could affect nation’s means of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the animals and plants better than when they were trying to survive and struggle...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12455516014 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69817079364 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7593186325 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193727784081 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731892331718 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560744599266 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112993185673 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499026772995 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.