Nations should pass laws to preserve remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
There is always a connection between the reduction of wilderness and development. As our civilization is advancing, we can see more and more destruction and reduction of forests. The argument states that nations should pass laws in favor of protecting the wilderness even if it hampers economic growth. I strongly agree with the prompt because to me no development is sustainable if nature is not preserved.
From the inception of our civilization, we have seen that development is directly proportional to environmental degradation. Most of the times industrial, economical growth has worked as a catalyst for environmental pollution and reduction in forest land. For instance, when Colombus first arrived at present-day America, it was mostly inhabitable forest land. After hundreds of years of hard work, one of the most advanced civilization stands there. On the other hand, more than half of the continent's wilderness has been destroyed during the progress of American civilization. One time we needed a place to live, needed places to build industries to make our life easier. A vast amount of wilderness was destroyed to make cities, roads, airports and many more. At that time the world's population was much less than what it is today. There was a vast amount of uncharted forests at t other places. Things like global warming, the rise of sea level, air pollution were not of that concern. So, people were not that concerned about the environment, but things have changed over time. We are now facing major environmental threats like temperature increase, Ozone layer dissolution, melting of polar ice which will inturn going to increase sea level, flooding many coastal cities like Newyork, New Delhi, Venice, etc. The earth's temperature is increasing every year, lands are losing their fertility, many species of animals and trees have been extinct and many more are following them every day.
So we need to take major steps to preserve our existence. However, People do not seem to be concerned. We are continuously destroying valuable forest lands which are necessary for our own existence. For example, The Amazon rain forest which is called the 'lungs of the earth' is losing its area every year. People are continuously cutting down trees, burning areas which are the only habitat of many endangered species to plant palm trees, and other crops. This kind of destructive activities mostly arises from economic gains. This forest is said to provide 20% of the total oxygen that humans inhale. So, this kind of activities will lead to massive natural calamities. As a society and civilization, we have come a long way. We no longer need more places to make houses as we did before. Multistoried buildings can accommodate a large number of people in a small place. With the advancement technologies, we can grow four to five times more crops at a smaller place which has reduced the necessity for cultivable land. Industries can now be set up in barren places like the desert or at some places where wilderness will not be threatened.
Some people may argue that to ensure a better life we need economical growth. They may also support some developing countries approach to prefer economic growth over preserving the environment. But our very existence depends on the environment itself. These kinds of development will not sustain for a long period. We may have tall buildings, exotic cities, sophisticated machines that were meant to make our life easier but what is the point of having such kind of technologies while we cannot protect the environment which is the most needed thing for our existence.
It is high time that nations should take immediate actions. We are heading to a critical point from where there would be no coming back.
If we continue to do what we are doing now, maybe in a decade we are going to hit the bottom, we would not be able to reverse what we have done, we will be left with no other option but to see humanity go extinct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...radation. Most of the times industrial, economical growth has worked as a catalyst for env...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'continents'' or 'continent's'?
Suggestion: continents'; continent's
...n the other hand, more than half of the continents wilderness has been destroyed during th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as been destroyed during the progress of American civilization. One time we neede...
^^
Line 7, column 782, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...irports and many more. At that time the worlds population was much less than what it i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...ke Newyork, New Delhi, Venice, etc. The earths temperature is increasing every year, l...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t which is called the lungs of the earth is losing its area every year. People ar...
^^
Line 9, column 830, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... Multistoried buildings can accommodate a large number of people in a small place. With the advan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 60, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ue that to ensure a better life we need economical growth. They may also support some deve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3333.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 667.0 442.535393258 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99700149925 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08196252842 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77810973089 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 338.0 215.323595506 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506746626687 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1051.2 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 20.2370786517 188% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1261615322 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7105263158 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5526315789 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157043354149 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396921342852 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559564340713 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934794537089 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594305569738 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.