As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of debilitating illness and diseases such as Alzheimer's disease is slowing being solved of by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.
One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as as example of deteriorating minds is the use of Internet and cell phones. In the past, humans had to seek out information in many different environments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularly substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such as reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity off computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside off a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with Internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: as
...ability of humans may initially be seen as as example of deteriorating minds is the u...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
..., humans had to seek out information in many different environments and aspects of life. Now h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, for example, i think, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 238.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15338863715 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4639336315 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.272727273 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182372347641 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774901381241 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458946031687 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155543521663 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132080376153 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.