As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

The rapid growth of technology helping human beings to carry out tasks at minimum time and more efficiently. This drastic change of doing things with machines or completely by machines has caused more dependence of our on them. I agree with the author that this over-dependence has resulted in a steady decline in human intelligence in doing basic things.

Before the evolution of the calculator, people used to count mentally. Surprising thing was that they had mastered this skill over time and were able to subtract, multiply, division, and addition of two numbers accurately most of the time. The good thing was of this is one was able to calculate at any time and any place. Today people generally tend to do even small calculation in calculator which can be easily done mentally. This shows a deterioration of skill and confidence of human being on self.

The discovery of computers has dramatically changed the way how humans now work. The inventions like the washing machine and vacuum cleaner have made human life more relaxing. Similarly, since the invention of the television caused people to stick around their sofa for a very long time which results in an increase in ignorance towards more necessary activities.

Today it is hard to find one who is not on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. As a result, this virtual world has hijacked the almost whole real world. The distance between people has increased while social media sites aimed to connect people. One with hundreds of friends on these websites often feels lonely in the real world.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... often feels lonely in the real world.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.9520958084 8% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 2260.96107784 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 261.0 441.139720559 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00766283525 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65171746713 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.468620217663 137% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8838539065 57.8364921388 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.1333333333 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46666666667 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144005651092 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463818895522 0.0743258471296 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047118045911 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878990301091 0.128457276422 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614190330834 0.0628817314937 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.3799401198 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.