As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
This topic raises the controversial issue human dependence on technology will reduce their ability to think for themselves. Indisputably, some might argue that over-dependence on the use of technology will lead to laziness which reduces the ability to think as humans. Nevertheless, others will argue that, the use of technology will create more time to think and also solve more complex problems. After careful consideration, I will argue that as humans, rely more on technology to solve our problems it will give more time to thing and also solve more problems.
The use of technology makes things done fast, this lead to the creation of more time to think and solve more complex problems, for example in the are of mathematics the use of a simple calculator make addition easy and it's done fast, this lead to human to think and open a new aspect of science called computational mechanics - where the use of differential equations to solve more complex real-life problems in engineering, theoretical physics and cosmology, all these will not be possible if not the time created by the use of computers to solve these complex differential equations.
Also, the use of technology also creates more problems for humans, such that in other to solve them it becomes impossible not to think. For example, the use internal combustion engines in transportation, create the problem of polluting the environment with carbon monoxide, also the over-dependence of humans in fossil fuel brings about the release of chlorofloro carbon gasses - these gasses are harmful to humans and deplete the ozone layers. All these problems lead to the to a new field of generation of clean energy from natural sources such as solar, geothermal, hydroelectricity, wind energy and so on, all these cannot be impossible if not for the ability of humans to think for themselves to solve problems created from the dependence on technology. Also more problems have been solved through research which is made possible by the internet, because it has turned the world to a global village such that a person in Nigeria can get information about a problem in an Indian person is trying to solve, communicate easily with such person and together they can tackle the problem from different angle and solve it as efficient as possible.
Another field where technology has been actively applied to solve more problems in the areas of medicine, in the olden days diseases such as polio and malaria that have significantly taken the lives of humans are reduced to trivial sickness, all these are made possible by the use of technology to facilitate research and synthesis of chemical together to make drugs and potent vaccines. Also, the use of imaging has made it possible for x-rays to be used in hospitals to assist doctors to see the problems in patients body such as bone fractures so as to enable the best treatments to such patients, all these will not be possible if humans have reduced ability to think because of technology.
However, some might argue that since humans are naturally lazy, the use of technology will lead to not be to think for ourselves because we see people these days that cannot do a simple arithmetic because of the over-dependence of calculators or not even knowing the meaning of some trivial words because Google is just a click away from air smartphones.
In conclusion, human dependence on technology has not reduced pure ability to think, because we can see that even though nature and technology itself brings lots of problems these days but humans are still providing solutions to these problems which will not be possible, if we are not thinking again.
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College. "To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's 59
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 66
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e more complex problems, for example in the are of mathematics the use of a simple calc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ated from the dependence on technology. Also more problems have been solved through ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 548, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...in patients body such as bone fractures so as to enable the best treatments to such pati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3051.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 611.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99345335516 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81849752841 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.40589198036 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 997.2 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 23.0359550562 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.525595412 60.3974514979 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 234.692307692 118.986275619 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.0 23.4991977007 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386588820011 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183178153855 0.0831039109588 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101725874603 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224613678587 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121179740616 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 14.1392134831 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 48.8420337079 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 12.1743820225 177% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 11.2143820225 185% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.