As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni

The issue statement stats that as people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves deteriorate. I do agree with the authors' statement. i will delineate my argument with examples to support this case with evidences.

Firstly, Technology has changed a lot compared to previous generations, New inventions are making sure that human's use more of their brain than their body. To illustrate, In small manufacturing company, welding process is done with hands of the worker, making it risker for worker if he gets distracted by something, because of this, the final product might not be superficially smooth as it should be. Here, Invention of automatic welding machines comes into play, it welds the metal smoothly, and the worker too is safe from the sparkles that arise from the welding process.

Moreover, to support my argument, Technology has made huge changes to how people use their time on solving complex calculation. In ancient time, people use to calculate on paper, it took them days to calculate those numbers. But, after the Invention of calculator, this invention made it possible for humans to calculate huge of amount of numbers in no time.

However, this technological invention made humans dependent on tech goods rather depending on themselves for completing the assigned work. For example, Today's generation children don’t want to do their work themselves they want some device to that work for them, like Alexa, this device by amazon.com, is a great device it lets you change just by your voice, it doesn't need to come and change by your hand. It's a nice invention but it makes people lazy.

To sum up, technological advancement has made the ability of humans bad compared to previous times.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...selves deteriorate. I do agree with the authors statement. i will delineate my argument...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
... I do agree with the authors statement. i will delineate my argument with example...
^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... I do agree with the authors statement. i will delineate my argument with example...
^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ex calculation. In ancient time, people use to calculate on paper, it took them day...
^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... lets you change just by your voice, it doesnt need to come and change by your hand. I...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...t need to come and change by your hand. Its a nice invention but it makes people la...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08873720137 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75741728219 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9543503596 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.692307692 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253941777078 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967001565043 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11654181121 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149868608287 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133538048009 0.0667264976115 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.