As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Every day, humans are developing new technology that each time we wake up in the morning, we find something new that has the potential to change our lives. Truly, some of these innovations made the impossible to possible. Although the development of technology has compromised some of our intellectual capabilities, it is not limiting our creativity which is the essence of human cognitive abilities. In addition, in some fields, technology and human thinking has advanced together.
Admittedly, humans are relying heavily on technology to avoid the menial tasks that propelled us to think more. In the past, we did not have smartphones that could store thousands of phonenumbers and we usually memorized important ones, which helped with our memorization skills. Furthermore, nowadays there are many schools that use the calculator as a imperative tool in math classes. This act not only deteriorates student's abilities to calculate using their minds, but also debilitates their familiarity with numbers which is important in understanding higher concepts in math. Hence, our reliability on these innovations has - especially in our quotidian tasks - dwindled our abilities.
Nevertheless, in fields such as arts or abstract studies like profound mathematics, our cognitive competence cannot be replaced by these inventions. A highly exalted art piece is recognized because of the novelty which is a virtue that cannot be created by machines. Moreover, great minds of each era are able solve intricate math problems by providing logical proofs of them which is impossible for a mere tool to accomplish. These disciplines all commonly require the imagination of human minds, and it is lucid that this is not what technology can supplant.
Furthermore, in some studies technology provides a solid ground for the humans to broaden their intellectual spectrum. Especially in statistics and engineering, due to the advancement of computer - which provides unprecedented calculating power - we were able to study fields that were once thought as impossible. For instance, without the development of the GPUs, Deep Learning could not have been applied to image recognition or NLP because of the immense calculations required to make the theory feasible. Consequently, with the development of technology, we face new possibilites that can broaden our knowledge.
In conclusion, because technology is helping us to solve everyday tasks, we are not motivated to take care of these by ourselves. Still, we possess imagination and creativity that machines cannot never imitate, and by collaborating with them we too can push our limits of knowledge further.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...many schools that use the calculator as a imperative tool in math classes. This a...
^
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'studies'' or 'study's'?
Suggestion: studies'; study's
...can supplant. Furthermore, in some studies technology provides a solid ground for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of these by ourselves. Still, we possess imagination and creativity that machines...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51100244499 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16192538852 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552567237164 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2407009345 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.631578947 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148081170057 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488337002792 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426482982071 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828092065475 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263525286865 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.