As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology plays an increasingly important role in our lives. The pace of advancement of technology is becoming faster and faster and we rely more and more on technology to solve problems. Therefore, some people argue that the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
This argument is not without ground. Surely we see more and more technology being used in our work and lives and it takes care of a lot of things for us. If we want to do a calculation, we can use a calculator instead of doing it manually. If we have a question, we no longer need to study and analyze to get an answer. We can simply search for an answer online. With the amazing improvement of machine learning, the computer can solve some of the hardest problems better than the smartest human being. For example, AlphaGo beat the best professional Go players in the world. It seems like technology makes thinking and analyzing unnecessary for humans.
However, if we look deeper, we may find this is not true. Surely the existence of technology makes it no longer necessary for humans to think and analyze certain problems. It does not mean that humans are not analyzing and solving intellectually challenging problems. When deciding which algorithm is best at solving a practical problem, it is the engineer that makes the decision. When evaluating the strategy and evidence for a case, it is the attorney that makes the decision to best defend the party being represented. When taking stunning photos, it is the photographer that chooses the best angle and timing. Although technology certainly plays an important role in our lives, the ability of humans to think cannot be replaced.
In addition, the advancement of technology makes it possible for humans to think about problems that did not exist or were not solvable. If the internet does not exist, there will be no search engines for web pages, and thus there will be no need for a faster and more accurate algorithm. If high definition TV does not exist, engineers will not need to develop technology for a higher resolution camera. If humans cannot build a rocket that can fly into space, there will be no need for scientists to calculate the best trajectory for launching a rocket. If anything, the availability of technology opens doors for humans to fields that were not accessible and enable humans to think better and smarter.
Technology plays a critical role in today’s human activities. The advancement of technology enables humans to think more freely and more creatively than ever before. People should not be worried about the technology but rather embrace it and use it to open a world with more imagination and more critical thinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...est defend the party being represented. When taking stunning photos, it is the photo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hnology for a higher resolution camera. If humans cannot build a rocket that can f...
^^
Line 7, column 558, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...est trajectory for launching a rocket. If anything, the availability of technolog...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9302832244 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75607997997 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459694989107 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9796319082 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0384615385 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6538461538 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46205950234 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123967688849 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103349397944 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295625011217 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111525442181 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.