As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
With the rapid growth of technology we are able to perform many tasks with ease. Technology can complete many tasks for us. But, still technology will think what humans have given it to think. It cannot think itself. All technology needs human to operate. Even if the technology uses artificial intelligence it will need human to operate it. So, Human ability of thinking will not deteriorate.
Technology are made by humans. Technology lacks in ability to think itself. Humans are the ones who operate on technology. For example, in a factory equipped with high technological equipment will need humans to operate them. Moreover, a student studying in school can't rely on technology completely. If the student is given to write an essay technology cannot write an essay for him. The essay have various requirements and technology cannot fulfill all the requirement as the student can. Similarly scientist also use technology but they need to solve big complex issues by themselves. Technology helps human in thinking but human cannot rely on technology completely. We can also take example of ETS GRE. My essay in GRE is read by a human and a computer. Since ETS cannot rely on marks given by computer ETS will give my essay to a person to read it. In this way technology will help us to solve a problem faster but for complex problem human brain will be needed. So, the ability of thinking will not deteriorate.
To even bolster my statement that ability of human to think themselves will not deteriorate we can take example of many recent innovation. With the rapid growth of technology we are now even more capable of making a big innovation. Many space agencies are planning to go to Mars and stay there. Due to Spacex new innovation we cannot make rockets in less budget. Car are capable to drive itself. Our mobile phone is capable to doing many tasks from helping us to become fit to help us in many of our research works. We can talk with anyone in anywhere in the world with our mobile phone. Hence, with innovation of technology human are thinking more efficiently and making big innovations.
However, it is also true that we are thinking much less than before. We are able to use calculator and solve difficult arithmetic problems in a second. This makes us think less. When we think less our thinking capability will surely deteriorate. But, it is also true that with the help technology we are able to concentrate in complex problem. When concentrating in complex problem we will not deteriorate our thinking ability but it will bolster our thinking capability.
With the growth of technology we will be thinking more on complex problem. Hence, our thinking capability will not be deteriorated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... All technology needs human to operate. Even if the technology uses artificial intellig...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Moreover, a student studying in school cant rely on technology completely. If the s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...annot write an essay for him. The essay have various requirements and technology can...
^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...all the requirement as the student can. Similarly scientist also use technology but they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 760, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... GRE is read by a human and a computer. Since ETS cannot rely on marks given by compu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...o to Mars and stay there. Due to Spacex new innovation we cannot make rockets in less budget. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...cannot make rockets in less budget. Car are capable to drive itself. Our mobile pho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8747300216 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72370739578 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39524838013 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1382187607 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.0 118.986275619 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5135135135 23.4991977007 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.21621621622 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277402464749 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855870707428 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617793877638 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183110550681 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304466661731 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 14.1392134831 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.