As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The prompt argues that, as people rely more and more on technology to solve their problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will deteriorate. I mostly disagree with this position stated by the author for the following reasons which I will elucidate further. Nevertheless, I do concede that in some situations human thinking is surely affected due to the technology.
To begin with, who has created technology? Humans themselves right. Humans introduces technologies to reduce their work and make life easier. If humans themselves have created technologies to make life easier, they obviously know what are the ill effects of it. For example a 'Mobile Phone' if mobiles were not introduced by humans years ago, could we imagine to live the same life that we live right now. No, we would have not been connected to each other, the development that we have seen would not be possible.
At the same time, we need technology in our day to day life it is not possible of us in this generation, to completely deploy technology out of our lives. Each and every field like media, science, industry, education, etc are dependent on technology. For instance, we can not run a industry producing canned beans without using the technical machines used in the factories. Technology is the need for our future and it must be used properly for sustainable growth of human race. And proper use of technology does not hamper the the human ability to think for themselves.
Just like they say every coin has two sides, the passage stated here has a other side as well. Relying more and more on technology in our daily lives has introduced lethargy in our life. Even to do the simplest things in our daily life we use technology. For instance, to switch on the fan nowadays we use remotes and senses like 'a clap'. In this particular case, we could surely move and switch on the fan on our own yet, we use a remote for the simplest work. This is making us more and more lazy. Our lazyness do affect us mentally and this sluggishness is not letting us think for ourselves.
In conclusion, "lose some and gain some" is a true principle. same goes with the prompt stated above by the author technology making our life easier may also have some ill-effects.
Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile Phone if mobiles were not introduced by humans years ago, could we imagine to...
^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine living'.
Suggestion: imagine living
...troduced by humans years ago, could we imagine to live the same life that we live right now. N...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...echnology. For instance, we can not run a industry producing canned beans without...
^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...roper use of technology does not hamper the the human ability to think for themselves. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...roper use of technology does not hamper the the human ability to think for themselves. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... two sides, the passage stated here has a other side as well. Relying more and mo...
^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Same
...nd gain some' is a true principle. same goes with the prompt stated above by th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 282, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...however, archaeologists discovered such a 'Palean' basket in Lithos, an...
^
Line 6, column 513, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean ba...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87159533074 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72599128371 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511673151751 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1765452519 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235736965056 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678875251989 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802824233946 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124674070922 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113242563009 0.0667264976115 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.