The given topic is highly contentious because different people may have a disparate opinions on the given topic. Some may go for the topic while some cannot embrace it at all. I believe as far as I am concerned I am dissonant with the given topic “As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate”. I consider that the creativity of humans to think after relying on technology won’t deteriorate. Technology is serving us for decades in the medical, engineering, and, economics sector.
From the beginning, technology has helped the agriculture sector to increase productivity. Using a variety of technical tools and modern ways of farming the productivity of land is increased from the past. Research and development in the agriculture field have helped us to invent a variety of new crops with a high yield ratio. The timespan for producing vegetables is decreased using the greenhouse effect. These things have increased humans to think more creatively while relying on technology.
In addition, technology has served in medical and engineering backgrounds. Different non-curable diseases from fast like Alzheimer’s, cancer, and Aids are cured with the help of increasing technology. It can be seen that people relying on technology has helped to boost thinking capability. As people are fully dependent on technology; nevertheless, people are creative. Technology has boosted people’s minds to be more creative. People are learning new ideas from YouTube and other online learning platforms. Different types of research were done relying on new technology that has helped in controlling the environment from different consequences.
Technology helps to spread the news all over the world that makes people are aware of future consequences and problems. Technology unites the entire population as a group. It helps in sharing information from one place to another in a very short period that was tortuous. The recent outbreak, Coronavirus, is taken down through vaccines generated in the lab using modern technology and research.
There may be some negative effects of technology however; it helps in a variety of problem-solving activities. Thus, I consider it as a bright side of the future for the development of the nation as well as the human race.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...e different people may have a disparate opinions on the given topic. Some may go for the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds being'.
Suggestion: minds being
...eative. Technology has boosted people’s minds to be more creative. People are learning new ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30831099196 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08168751429 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517426273458 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3049037345 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0869565217 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2173913043 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69565217391 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256208432743 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737254516314 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823202656882 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138077083334 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811344847724 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.