People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Taking risks in terms of individual behavior normally means producing significant costs that might urge one to be fully responsible. That is, risky actions are rarely undertaken without a strong motivation or inevitable circumstances. When faced by decisive moments, it is rather safer and wiser to think twice before taking action than just committing oneself directly to the task. Still, in certain situations that require immediate efforts or collective behavior, such actions may be regarded as mandatory that may lead to an enhancement of human conditions. The essay will provide evidence in evaluating both sides in order to gain balancing viewpoints and achieve rightful assessment.
To begin with, the recommendation seems plausible in general circumstances in which devastating consequences are predicted. Especially in times of modern culture, it can be suggested that we shall be aware that once becoming adults the responsibility lies on ourselves once our deeds are done. The fact that our everydays are filled with numerous chances for change urges us not only to recognize the freedom to choose but also to admit that we are in charge of accepting the results. Therefore, the famous phrase, “think twice before taking any action” can be a helpful motto in particular to civilized individuals.
On the other hand, however, some circumstances often require quick responses and do not offer sufficient time to ponder on the matter at length. It is unlikely that when given enough time to consider, many heroic deeds might not have been done. Take for example the 911 terror that happened in the middle of Manhattan, New York. Those who were stuck in the building lacked the strength to escape and save themselves. At the moment, several bypassing citizens delved into the collapsed buildings in order to give help to the victims. Such a reaction could have been done because it lacked conscious thoughts or sufficient consideration, which otherwise would have lost its proper timing in grasping the chance to save the people involved.
Similarly, many innovative entrepreneurs today have taken risky actions before reaching a conclusive and promising outlook. Having a strong belief in their ideas, while the others presumed them as absurd, well known CEOs such as Steve Jobs of Apple or Jeff Bezos of Amazon.com changed the world by creating new businesses that no one else had thought of before. Prompt reaction to the public market and unmatched enthusiasm led them to risky actions but ended up with great success in wealth and prosperity.
Nonetheless, in favor of preventing fanaticism and fascist movements, we shall be well informed by the perilous elements of potential violence hidden beneath spontaneous behaviors. History has shown how human species can become tremendously atrocious through calamity done by drives of instincts. For instance, as the Nazi Regime emerged in the political mainstream, the majority of the German public ardently raged against the Jewish who were convicted as the main culprit of the economical crisis. Considering that such recklessness resulted to holocaust and a loss of humanity, it is unreasonable not to mention that passion and enthusiasm caused by taking risks is may lead to irrevokable catastrophe to human species.
Thus, we may conclude that taking risks in certain situations may sometimes lead to innovation or salvation but can also result in invaluable costs that cannot be redeemed nor reimbursed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Taking risks in terms of individual beha...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... particular to civilized individuals. On the other hand, however, some circums...
^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...re convicted as the main culprit of the economical crisis. Considering that such recklessn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in general, in particular, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2934.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 551.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32486388385 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87437209617 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 335.0 215.323595506 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607985480944 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 920.7 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6828104304 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.565217391 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9565217391 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47826086957 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12172387346 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301777091026 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386691983985 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517627554568 0.150359130593 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036389718179 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 178.0 100.480337079 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.