Everyone has to make choices in their daily lives and some choices tend to be riskier than others; before picking a choice for a risky action should people stand by and consider the consequences of going ahead with that action? I believe that people should consider the consequences before making a risky choice. Of course, in some situations one might not have enough time to think of all the possible consequences. Firstly, because people might regret their decision on a risky event, they should consider the consequences before hand. Secondly, their choices might impact the lives of others without realizing it. Finally, for some situations it a restriction of some sort might hinder the ability to think of the consequences. However, even in such a situation I believe that one should make a tiny brainstorm or quick summary of the possible consequences before taking that action.
Some risky actions that we take come to are out of pure emotions and without any thought. During these times, depending on the action one should always consider the consequences present. For example, if a tennis player is injured in the finals of a match and their doctor notifies them that the injury can end their future career prospects if they continued playing, then it would be wise to consider the consequences of before playing another match. If the player continues then the it could lead to a future without tennis, hence, in this situation it would be advantageous for the player to consider the consequences. However, if the doctor says its a minor injury and the player is winning the match then it would be disadvantageous of them to take time to consider the consequences as they would lose their momentum. Additionally there are some situations where the thinking of the consequences show that their actions might impact the lives of other people.
Prior to taking an action a person should always consider the consequences as the action might impact other people around them. For instance, if someone is having suicidal tendencies then they should always consider what would happen to their family and loved ones if they were to suicide. The person should think about how much their family may regret their loss and the emotions that might come over their loved ones. Doing so might help prevent that suicide as the consequences of the person doing the action might result to the family suffering major financial and mental issues. In this situation it would be very advantageous to think of the consequences present. Of course for some situations we are unable to fully consider the consequences due some restriction.
A few risky situations involve quick decisions; thus, a person might not have time to think of the consequences. At which time it would be inefficient to think of the consequences before making the decision. A real life example of such situation is the one where Captain Sully had to land the aircraft in the Hudson river. The pilot of the aircraft, Captain Sully, did not have enough time to fully consider the consequences of landing the aircraft in the water. In his situation it was either land the aircraft in the water with some survival chances or crash and die for sure. During this situation it would be disadvantageous to fully think of all the consequences as the final result might be negative. However, even in that situation a brief brainstorm of the consequences should be made so that it help clarify which action has better predicted results.
While it is not possible to always predict and think of the consequences in a situation, if the time permits then one should spend all their time pondering properly on what the consequences should be. Also, if there is insufficient time to think then one should make a quick brainstorm, or summary, of the first consequences that come to mind. This is because without factoring in the negative impacts of an action it would be unwise to take a leap of faith and only hope for the best when one could decide with facts over pure hope.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
..., they should consider the consequences before hand. Secondly, their choices might impact t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...her match. If the player continues then the it could lead to a future without tennis, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nsequences. However, if the doctor says its a minor injury and the player is winnin...
^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...nces as they would lose their momentum. Additionally there are some situations where the thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h action has better predicted results. While it is not possible to always predi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 36.0 12.4196629213 290% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3348.0 2235.4752809 150% => OK
No of words: 684.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11403887952 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68106811944 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.372807017544 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1033.2 704.065955056 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5673614065 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.448275862 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5862068966 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8275862069 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290390009204 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994360445266 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797046964671 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18971472297 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603110573567 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.