Critic a plan or policy may be much easier than doing that job. Critics could see to an issue in idealistic view and attack the disadvantages. The prompt claim that people who are committed in planning or implementing an project or idea less likely to have critical view on that. This prompt is intricate and has various views that should be considered. However, I mostly agree with this prompt and I explain my reasons.
First of all, the people who involved in planning a policy, they could reflect their ideas in the policy. They can critic the policy before publicy propogate. Thus, they could show thier ideas and change the policy as much as possible and it means the policy is aligned with thier thought to some extent. For insatnce, Obama's cabinet members, the former president of the united states, were involved in Obama health care program. This program established by different experts who reflect the cabinet's members and this program was approved after months of evaluation. Therefor, the program mostly reflect the cabinet's ideas and they are rarely, even any, critical on this program, even after more than four years.
Moreover, when people are involved in a project, they would be aware of difficulties and limitation of implementation of the project. They distance from idealistic views and face realistic ones. Thus, before they critic the project, they would consider the conditions of the project. For example, project staff of a bridge on a Karon river, i Iran, are aware of the environmental, economical, and social issue of projects. So, they may rarely have critical idea about delay in the project because they know paymant by the government had delay for several months that affect on time schedule of the project.
On the other hand, some may claim due to the fact that people who committed in project are vigilant of the detail of the project, so they know defects of it properly and know what changes could improve it. For instance, in aforementioned projects, designers and constructors of the projects, as were involved in the project, can provide some suggestion that improve the perforance of the project. Or on the contrary, they know the weak points of the project that can mentioned.
In conclusion, this prompt is complicated issue that we can investigate in several views. Although, some may reckon the people who are involved in an idea or peoject could have more critical view on it, I believe they more likely to support them due to awareness of limitation and difficulties of implementation of a project or policy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e committed in planning or implementing an project or idea less likely to have cri...
^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...nment had delay for several months that affect on time schedule of the project. On the o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96046511628 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66656582196 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453488372093 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.710119976 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1294110481 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469019944994 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422963721328 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821404846964 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466824115897 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.