People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement claims that people can commit to an idea or policy deeply as well as hold a critical view about it. I only partly agree with such a statement generally, as such a situation can only apply to some ingenious people, such as scientists and artists.
As we all know, ordinary people only accept the ideas or policies which meet their expectation, but rarely posing challenges to them. One of the reasons is most people tend to be superficial in modern society. With the fast growing of internet industry, people nowadays have easier access to ideas and information. Many KOL(key opinion leaders) will offer their analysis regarding the heat events, and thereby attracting the attention of the public who agree with their ideas. However, this type of communication between KOL and their fans is one-way business and the public might become too indolent to be critical of KOLs’ ideas. Thus, ordinary people’s commitment to ideas or policies doesn’t mean they will have the willingness to criticise the ideas or policies.
However, there’re still some people in our society who are keen to question ideas and policies, especially scientists and artists. For example, Galileo had substantiated the theory which indicated the sun was the centre of the universe. Such a theory was refused by his counterparts and people in that era, even though it laid a solid foundation to the development of modern astronomy. The education Galileo received must teach him to believe the geocentric theory, but after his deep investigation and calculation to this issue, he questioned that idea and proved the heliocentric theory. As to reasons why scientists or artists can both accept an idea and also challenge it, I contend that they have the intrinsic desire to pursue the truth no matter how eloquent an idea might seem to be. Thanks to the existence of scientists, people still can be objective to the ideas or policies even if they have previously agree with such things.
In sum, while most people only accept an opinion without the willingness and ability to question it, a small proportion of people such as scientists and artists do advance the prosperity of our society by not merely receiving ideas, but challenging them and pursuing the truth.
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell."Two years ago, the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new bu 62
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 70
- The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine:"Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 921, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'agreed'.
...r policies even if they have previously agree with such things. In sum, while most...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25768321513 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.130023640662 0.157235817809 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0685579196217 0.0880659088768 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0567375886525 0.0497285424764 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0520094562648 0.0444667217837 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0874704491726 0.12292977631 71% => OK
Participles: 0.0189125295508 0.0406280797675 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.78845728118 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0425531914894 0.030933414821 138% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101654846336 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212765957447 0.0249443105267 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0141843971631 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2271.0 2732.02544248 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07219251337 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382352941176 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270053475936 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200534759358 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139037433155 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78845728118 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542780748663 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 60.3505723589 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 24.9333333333 23.380412469 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2015065673 59.4972553346 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.4 141.124799967 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 23.380412469 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.674092028746 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 51.9386809269 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.52475247525 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47563686331 0.391690518653 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137651570054 0.123202303941 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0597848949413 0.077325440228 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.58663893765 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145016940927 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212431783539 0.161403998019 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638150799116 0.0892212321368 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.385421394033 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.139078099151 0.0692045440612 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316869610425 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870285940284 0.0653680567796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.