People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve

Essay topics:

People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

It is widely accepted that every individual through different steps in their life finds some opinions closely related to their interests and beliefs and attempts to be committed to those ideas. The author claims here that most of these individuals, besides being committed to those opinions, also they are the most critical of it. From my vantage point, this claim seems to be coherent and persuasive. The reasons for supporting my perspective will be mentioned in the following paragraphs.

First, one should take into account the fact that the more a person is committed to an opinion, the more she or he tries to acquire information about the idea. It is crystal clear that every individual can accept a policy or opinion deeply only they find it beneficial, and this knowledge cannot be gain only by gathering enough information from various sources. To shed light on this issue, nowadays, many people highly stick to traditional ways in order to cure different diseases. This commitment to traditional approaches can come from a broad investigation about these approaches’ advantageous and disadvantageous. Therefore, by equipping themselves with comprehensive knowledge, they are more aware of both drawbacks and benefits of this way of curing. As a result, they can easily critic such traditional approaches.

Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that in most of the cases, committing to a specific opinion comes from after a long time and experiencing different ways. It is no secret that every person attempts to obtain various experiencing in order to recognize the best way. Hence, it enhances their chance to find an exact rule and attach to it. By trying manifold ways, they gather invaluable experiences, and consequently, they boost their awareness. So, it is entirely acceptable that people by experiencing diverse ways and choosing some opinions as their lives’ rules are more capable of critic those rules.

Finally, in some cases, people who do not hold an exact opinion can readily critic it, too. Based on previous paragraphs, people endeavor to boost their knowledge due to choosing the best rules as their lives’ ways. Since they could become familiar with variant subjects and opinions, this equips them for further investigation. In fact, individuals evaluate both negative and positive features of every rule and policy, and then, they could choose the best of them. Therefore, they could easily critic different facets of opinions besides those who are supporters of the opinions.

To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that people, by improving their knowledge and allotting adequate time could dominate on some opinions and select them as their guide. So, they can critic those opinions effectively, although there are some counterexamples in which opponents of opinions can play better in the role of criticisms of these opinions.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 552, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ferent facets of opinions besides those who are supporters of the opinions. To wra...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, in fact, as a result, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32334047109 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92023235662 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516059957173 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7506618941 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2272727273 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126621932737 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040955964371 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393624647378 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758133707097 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192478293609 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.