Movies and television have more negative effects on the way young people behave.
Without a shadow of doubt, television and movies have prominent roles in entertaining people. In this regard, some people are inclined toward this opinion that television programs' adverse impacts are more than their positive points whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. From my vantage point, the first idea seems more rational. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two noticeable reasons.
First, one should take into account the fact that some television programs elevate the violence level in society. It is no secret that action movies have big fans in different ranges of ages. Therefore, movie producers attempt to add more violence and anger to their movies' bodies in order to make them more interesting and fascination for spectators. Consequently, this sense of violence has a considerable adverse influence on young people. To shed light on this issue, when my nephew was 12 years old, he was exposed to the Starts war, which is one of the action movies that has been shown on the television. Before that, he was a calm person and played with his little brother friendly. But, by watching this movie he has changed his behavior and most of the time, he tried to fight with his brother like the movie's actors. As a result, his behavior not only caused to become an angrier person but also had negative effects on his brother.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that a big part of television programs includes advertising, which some of them advertise some negative habits. It is widely accepted that people pay attention to advertisements due to the fact that some of them propose indeed attractive suggestions. But, restaurants and fast foods advertisements constitute a part of it, which persuades people to buy and use their products. It is lucidly obvious that young people are more interested in these products. As a result, it can have negative impacts on their habits and physical health. A study has been conducted in Tehran about the effects of advertisements on people. For a month, the researchers tried to put more advertisements for a specific fast food restaurant on television. It revealed that the restaurant sales amount had a significant rise. This study has specified the effect of advertisement on attracting people, which can be used wrongly to spread negative habits.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although some movies and television programs are instructive and informative, some of their programs are completely harmful to young people. In fact, the producers should be more sensitive and careful in selecting and producing movies.
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 79
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of KNOW radio station."Several factors indicate that KNOW radio can no longer succeed as a rock-and-roll music station. Consider, for example, that the number of people in our listening area over fif 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinion of celebrities, such as entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know what is happening around the world, even if it does not affect your personal lives. 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, whereas, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15068493151 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86116422315 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527397260274 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3586827972 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0869565217 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0434782609 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285649381986 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750679789308 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524890073201 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165619700923 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275302202223 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.