Emotions are a complicated part of the human beings and though sometimes play an important part in inter-personal bonding and caregiving, are not very fruitful in the decision making process. It is often observed that most emotions surface realitively quickly and in the spur of the moment based on multiple factors you are experiencing at that point of time such as fear, anger, etc.
It is often these decisions made in the split second that can lead to actions that can not be amended or rectified at a later point in time when rational and logical thinking begin after the emotions have subsided. For example, when a boss has a bad day, there is a high chance that he might lash out at an employee who failed to respond appropriately at a call center. But instead of rationally trying to fix the mistake and minimizing the delay, the boss might only further create an inconvenience if he responded with anger.
When decisions are thoroughly thought through, they have enough time to bud and develop. This gives the person ample time to progressively develop the case and come to a decision that best suits the situation. Consider a case where two teams are given a task to construct a car. One team gathers together to decide the colour, the specifications and the remaining aspects of the car while the other team begins to assemble the car. The first team is likely to be in sync throughout the entire process and can identify flaws at the initial stage and develop on the idea as they think through. The brain is similar to a team, there are different parts of the brain processing different information and it is important to give time to each of the parts to rationalize with each other and come to a mutual concensus on a decision to be made.
Logic can help identify the pros and cons in a situation. It gives the mind enough time to analyse the future results of the decision or action and subsequently launch a series of what-if senarios to provide a cost for the decision. This kind of analysis is done in problem solving where one has to come up with an answer based on trail and error methods. You pick a solution and analyse the error corresponding to it. The task is to minimize the error for a corresponding solution. Similarly, your decision should either minimize the error or maximize the output and drawing out subsequent results can help with it.
Though decision making based on gut feeling is a predominantly used strategy in cases where a person is neutral, predominant decision making should happen with logic and sound thinking.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, similarly, so, while, as to, for example, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71937639198 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68226354513 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503340757238 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5312233586 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.722222222 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9444444444 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24806801839 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722683082984 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075003073224 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156012586418 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771580795526 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.