It is true to a very large extent that the human brain responds very well to positive reinforcements, whether be it gifts and treats on achieving something or exhibiting good behaviour. A part of the argument is in coherence with the above fact and says that the best way to teach is to praise positive behavior.
As humans, we are always seeking for attention and validation from others, and the fact that your actions gain the attention of others to an extent that they praise you symbolizes that you are on the right path. Consider the example of a school kid who has very good manners. The kid is repeatedly spoken well of by the teachers, his parents and parents of other kids who tell their kids to be like the kid with beyond polite manners. It is also true that he becomes a notable figure in the class because of his good image and people are constantly pointing to him in need for examples of good behaviour or to drive a point.
In continuation to the above, the kid with the good behavior becomes a role model to other kids in the class who want to be taken note of. Humans learn a lot through imitation and in this case, the other kids will imitate the above said good kid in order to gain the attention and praise and to get into the good books of the society.
The second part of the sentence takes a stance on ignoring the negative actions of people in the process of teaching. This is true when the behavior is insignificant or trivial. For instance, in the setting of a classroom, a kid always shouting out the answers when the good way to give answers is by raising the hand can be ignored but a kid who repeatedly involves himself in violent behavior and hurting the other kids in his classroom can not be ignored. In the first case, over time, the kids will realize and understand that the teacher never gives recognition to the student who shouts out the answer. So, the smart kids will eventually raise their hands in order to gain attention and thus good behavior is promoted and advocated. However, in the second instace, the kid might take this lack of attention as a green flag and proceed to abuse other kids. In such a situation, it is important to interfere and teach through negative reinforcements by punishing the kid.
In summary, the argument holds true to most extent that best actions can be promoted by praising positive actions and either ignoring or condemning negative actions. The above is not only true to a school setting but also can be applicable in a workplace wherein the good employee is always given credit through word of mouth and mentions in the CEO emails while the underperformers and average employee actions are not given any attention. The human mind is quick to learn the patterns and adapts itself in such a way to gain maximum attention and validation at most times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'symbolize'
Suggestion: symbolize
...thers to an extent that they praise you symbolizes that you are on the right path. Conside...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56862745098 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51224146338 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437254901961 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2026048376 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.444444444 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141002725985 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528077890359 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067809887972 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089731356841 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450105009436 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.