People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Logic is the key to efficient decision making but emotions are reponsible for inciting that logic. People making decisons with logic tend to analyze the positives and negatives rigourously, hence the possibility regarding whether the decsion is correct increases. Wheras, when we take decision emotionally we think myopically before reaching a decsion, therefore the chances that our decision will lead to unfavourable outcome increases.
Stock markets, a place where a myriad of investors make decisions on whether they should keep or sell a stock tend to fall into the two categories , one thinks emotionally, the other thinks logically. The outcome of emotional thinkers is mostly unprofitable, The reason being that people attach themselves with a stock which has provided them with a lot of profit in the past and tend to use it to reach a decision ignoring the current financials and technical aspects of the stock. Hence, emotions hinders our ability to evaluate a situation correctly which further leads to a poor decision.
A lot of business have failed because of emotions, but the case is different from stock market. CEO in business sometimes tend to make business choices which are solely based on emotion like an industrialist establishing a new product just because his father has a sentimental value attached to it without gaining any insight regarding the position of the current players making that product. Supposedly, the business went on to do well for, still "the ends do not justify the means" because all this implies are happy coincidents not efficient decisions. Hence, decision based on emotion although can be justified by logic, they would always lack a certain warrantedness.
Generals in army have to take decision logically because if their means of reaching a decision is solely contingent upon emotion, a lot of people who put there lives at stake will suffer. Hence the consequences are far worse if an emotional decision backfires, hence emotional decisions are poor
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ock tend to fall into the two categories , one thinks emotionally, the other think...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...siness choices which are solely based on emotion like an industrialist establishi...
^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion logically because if their means of reaching a decision is solely contingent...
^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o put there lives at stake will suffer. Hence the consequences are far worse if an em...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ires, hence emotional decisions are poor
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8621315664 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1950066254 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416420961869 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15561389516 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104827079612 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264182429001 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925587643598 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.