People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
First of all, I agree to the author that the decisions are to be taken strongly by identifying the pros and cons of the choice and its effects to the outcome. Decision based on logic succeed in most of the cases. One of such instances is buying stocks in the share market. It is mandatory to analyze every nook and corners of the company, the stock and the index before investing on the market unless we are wanting to be bankrupted. Some stocks grow everyday and most traders and investors fall on the trap of greed and invest on it based on their feeling and justify their choice insisting that "The stock will skyrocket" as per previous days report. More than 90% of such traders fail and lose all their investment. This is solely because of their decision based on their instinct or feeling. Almost every successful venture in the world was first decided by months and years of research not on feelings. So, those who just base their conclusion on their emotion could be called poor decision makers.
However, This is not always necessarily true. There are a lot of instances where taking decision based on our instinct benefits us. One most familiar case is the event of encounter with street violence. When we see someone getting beaten or violated by another in street, we have to be instinctive without thinking of any reasons and stop the fight. If we start using logic of who is getting beaten, whose fault it was and so on, the fight might escalate and serious injury can occur. If the fight is much more aggressive and involves group, out gut feeling would be run in most of the case and it is best to follow that instinct unless we want to get violated or taken to custody. More situations such as this could be seeing any wild animals. The animals cannot be reasoned and thinking whether it is violent or not might lead to injury or death.
Another instance of decision based on emotion is invention of Iphone. Had Steve Jobs used the historical evidence and available data, he would never start in the tech field. The situation of tech field in that era was not good and the vision he had was not even remotely being researched in any field. He trusted his feelings about the work and motivated others by giving acquisitive incentives. The plan worked and now Iphone has shaped the path to futuristic technology. So, Instinctive decisions are also much necessary to thrive in the world in many cases.
So to add up, those outcomes that possibly result in our permanent success in future and requires a lot of research, thoughts needs logical decision with a bit of emotional decision. While those situations of fight or flight will definitely be helped by instinctive decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...efore investing on the market unless we are wanting to be bankrupted. Some stocks grow ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ting to be bankrupted. Some stocks grow everyday and most traders and investors fall on ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... era was not good and the vision he had was not even remotely being researched in a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while, such as, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71157894737 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48628281096 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532631578947 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0331627684 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.52 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22961405478 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642721926035 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683180432893 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137403088824 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357060454828 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.