People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Decision making is a complicated process and it requires a lot of pondering and analyzing all possible outcomes; the decision made on emotional basis often leads to the failure of the good judgement and makes it's implementation insignificant. The prompt suggests that people who make decisions based on emotion and verify them afterwards are poor decision makers. In my opinion, I am completely consonant to the statement because of the following reasons.
To begin, the emotional decision leads to the unjust treatment and leads to the biasness. For instance, consider a judge making decisions based on the feelings rather that the facts and evidences; will he make make good judgement? Of course not, the emotional attachment makes person weak and incompetent to decide the good or bad for any circumstances. The judge should be able to make critical judgements based on the available facts and evidences. Similarly, if a politician makes the judgement based on the emotional basis, then he would be biased towards his families and acquitances; eventually, leading to the considerable loss or unfairness among the people. Therefore, the decisions should be based on the overall critical thinking.
Moreover, the decision making on the professional career is equally important for the success of a person; if the person is incompetent while decision making then he will achieve nothing. For instance, for a civil engineer, he has to make daily decisions in site and should be able to manage company's staff and the people of the environment on which he is working. If he can't handle the situation and makes decision based on emotion without considering the all aspects that might affect the project as a whole, and doesn't involve his rational thinking during decision making, then he is a poor decision maker. Also, the decision based on emotion can be fair to one household but it might affect the region and project as a whole. Justifying those decisions afterwards will be futile.
Furthermore, one should be able to consider the all aspects of any decisions and statements made, otherwise the decision will fall apart while implementing. For instance, in one of the biggest project in Nepal - Postal Highway- the lack of proper meditation on the situation has lead to the failure of the project as a whole. The decision makers didn't considered the effect of the destruction of forest (Chitwan National Park) on the rare species- like bengal tiger and one horned rhino- and made decision to construct the road which is now in hault.
In sum, the decision should be based on the critical thinking and one should ponder about all - positive and dark - sides of any decision. The afterward logic to justify the previous statement are pointless and such decision makers are of no use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: make
...r that the facts and evidences; will he make make good judgement? Of course not, the emot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed towards his families and acquitances; eventually, leading to the considerable ...
^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...vironment on which he is working. If he cant handle the situation and makes decision...
^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cants'.
Suggestion: cants
...vironment on which he is working. If he cant handle the situation and makes decision...
^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ight affect the project as a whole, and doesnt involve his rational thinking during de...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...project as a whole. The decision makers didnt considered the effect of the destructio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08061002179 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81305016857 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461873638344 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6585852887 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.736842105 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1578947368 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350587245948 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134324348356 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781171946472 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222359803658 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566428328849 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.