people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers
A persons character is judged on his principles and ideologies and how stringently he adheres to the rules and axioms formulated by the society. I agree to the given statement that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. The main reasons for my agreement to the given statement are potraying the weak decision making power of the person and the flexibility of nature of the person according to the changing circumstances making him a poor decision maker.
To begin with, a person who has the authority to make decisions should always be impartial to all his subjects. As his decisions would adversely affect the people who follow him. making emotional decisions as per the situations will make his decision making power weak and eventually his authority will be considered as a fiasco. For instance, a judge who is the supreme authority in the court and who has to adhere by the rules of the constitution, if makes any partial judgement for any person who breaches the laws of the constitution. Justifying that, considering his poor financial conditions he should be exonerated from the blame of robbery will affect his decision making powers and he will eventually be considered as a poor decision maker.
Secondly, a decision for the masses should be presented in very lucid way such that no further justification has to be given about the purpose of making such decisions. If questions are raised on the final judgement and the authority has to give justifications about the final decisions, it resembles the weak decision making power of the authority. On this grounds a support my agreement to the given statement.
Thirdly, a decision maker should always be shrewd and impartial while making decisions. Emotions and laws cannot be amalgamated together. doing this will have worse ramifications on the people following the decisions. For example, a police officer has the duty to arrest criminals and felons, if at any circumstances, the people transgressing the laws are the relative of the police officer, it his moral duty to arrest them without being emotional and giving a second thought. On this grounds, i agree to the given statement.
To sum up, i would like to conclude that it is of pivotal importance for the supreme authority to make even handed and impartial decisions for their subjects. Making so will bolster his decision making power and his subjects will retain faith in him without doubting his potential of leadership. Thus i agree to the given statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
A persons character is judged on his principles a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lways be impartial to all his subjects. As his decisions would adversely affect th...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Making
...rsely affect the people who follow him. making emotional decisions as per the situatio...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the supreme authority in the court and who has to adhere by the rules of the co...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...masses should be presented in very lucid way such that no further justification h...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ision making power of the authority. On this grounds a support my agreement to the g...
^^^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Doing
...nd laws cannot be amalgamated together. doing this will have worse ramifications on t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 482, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...otional and giving a second thought. On this grounds, i agree to the given statement...
^^^^
Line 4, column 496, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ving a second thought. On this grounds, i agree to the given statement. To sum u...
^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ree to the given statement. To sum up, i would like to conclude that it is of pi...
^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t doubting his potential of leadership. Thus i agree to the given statement.
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...bting his potential of leadership. Thus i agree to the given statement.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03529411765 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86433842311 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432941176471 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4129012155 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.631578947 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445371480721 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153244137349 0.0831039109588 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180032554014 0.0758088955206 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268026097048 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166466147817 0.0667264976115 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.