the best way for a socety to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The saying, united we stand and divided we fall is true in each and every sense for the entire upliftment of the socitey. A socitey imparting morals on the youth to cooperate with each other will achieve great success in a small span compared to other socities who demand a competition amongst the youth. I completely agree with the given statement that, the best way for a socitey to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. The youth of a nation are the pillars of the nation who fortify the future of the socitey. If they are made to compete with each other, there is a complete possibility that the future of the socitey would be a debacle rather than being a success. A socitey will be gauged on the welfare of its people. For that very reason, the leaders should cooperate with each other which will assure the success of the socitey. Countries like Pakistan have made the people revolt against the governemt for their rights inculcating into failure of the nation whereas, people of USA always support and abide to the government and hence have achieved greater heights in all aspects.
Firstly, a socitey who wants to achieve success in the fields of government and industry should instill a sense of cooperation amongst the youth because when people work with the attitude of achieving the similar goals, they surely succeed. Because they support each other. For instance, India which was ruled by britishers before 1947 and people in India had to face many hardships to be independent. But when people came together, they articulated their thoughts and they revolted against the britishers by adapting non cooperation and non violence movements, which helped them to succeed.
Secondly, as per the abbrevation of TEAM, together everyone achieves more is true in all aspects. When everyone works in unison and harmony they succed at a very rapid rate. I support my agreement to the given statement with this point.
Thirdly, when people have different and diverging opinions, everyone becomes adamant to prove his point right and contradicts the oppositions point which inculminates into the fiasco of the socitey in political and industrial aspects. For instance, the congress party was the ruling party in India for past 40 years, but recently, in the greed of competition amongst the political leaders to acquire the pivotal position, they failed miserably. Whereas, BJP the other leading party had the opinions of unison and hence they flourished and became the ruling party in the recent elections.
To, conclude, a socitey who has instilled the sense of competition amongst the youth will make them think in different ways. Which will make their position prone to failure. Thus, for achieving great heights in industry and politics, a society should impart the sense of cooperation amongst the youth and not a sense of competition,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the similar goals, they surely succeed. Because they support each other. For instance, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...will make them think in different ways. Which will make their position prone to failu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02240325866 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61788524518 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464358452138 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1085481315 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285151450924 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845568500191 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150951826606 0.0758088955206 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133859175676 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105505327899 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.